By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Sony - PSP-3000 & PSP-Go ( Side By Side )

I mean people on our boards (including me) are probably less efficient at guessing this optimal price than the dozens of people that Sony pays for that task (marketing division).

Or they should hire us.



Around the Network

Aiemond : I disagree. First, Sony is pretty happy with current PS3 sales. PS3 sells the same as the 360 worldwide but it's twice as expansive. Consumers see roughly twice more value in the PS3 right now, so my guess is the price is ok there too.

Second, if your way of thinking was true, Ipod and Iphones would have flopped. Features were poor for them compared to the price. It's all about design for this kind of products. And PSP Go looks a lot like an Iphone.



how do you adjust the screen brightness and volume on the psp go?

It looks really cool though.



̶3̶R̶D̶   2ND! Place has never been so sweet.


I guess you adjust them on screen with the pad (?)



Tony_Parker said:
Aiemond : I disagree. First, Sony is pretty happy with current PS3 sales. PS3 sells the same as the 360 worldwide but it's twice as expansive. Consumers see roughly twice more value in the PS3 right now, so my guess is the price is ok there too.

Second, if your way of thinking was true, Ipod and Iphones would have flopped. Features were poor for them compared to the price. It's all about design for this kind of products. And PSP Go looks a lot like an Iphone.

OK...Wrong. Any phone  have more features than the Iphone then?



Around the Network

The first Iphone was horribly overpriced and it wasn't even 3G (no high speed internet), there already were better nokia phones, still the Iphone sold millions... because of design (the 'cool' factor), portability and marketing.



ZenfoldorVGI said:

A. Smaller screensize
B. No support for UMD games
C. No UMD drive
D. Double the price
E. No conceivable advantages whatsoever
F. Sliding hinge will inevitably break, needless moving part
G. STILL doesn't protect the screen in your pocket
H. Have to rebuy your games

Why exactly, do some of you want this device?

A smaller screen...is not a plus because it's more portable.

This device costs less to create, and is lower quality.

Nobody should buy this, imo. People should send Sony a message that they won't just buy anything they put out strictly in the interest of supporting the company. They should actually make it worth buying, or at least an upgrade from an old console.

The purpose for the Go was to prevent piracy. Why are we paying extra for loss of SEVERAL major features, including screensize, ability to play games we already purchased, and UMD drive, when we could get a superior product for less.

I don't know how many people are really buying this, or just saying they are to support Sony.

Not ONE THING on this product is upgraded and many things are downgraded, and obvious flaws to the console, like controls, haven't been fixed at all.

Don't buy this. It sends a bad message to Sony.

It says they can take features away, charge vastly more, slap a new name on it, and it will boost sales....just no.

I couldn't agree with you more.  I decided to buy a PSP a couple of months ago but was going to wait until after E3 to see what the revision would bring to the table.  Less features for more money.  It's hard to believe that people are excited for this thing.  As for me, I'll be buying a PSP -3000 this week.   



MonstaMack said:

The Dell deals lasted more then several days. I'm a veteran on CAG and pretty much have no life when in comes to browsing that site. Nice try tho. Even at other times the normal price was $130-$140 which is still by far cheaper.

Do you remember what time frame that $110 deal was listed?

I actually went to the Dell website and debating whether I should get it or not.  Dell rolled out different deals for 10 day in a roll (they added a bonus 11th day deal after 10 days though).  I am pretty sure the PSP deal sold out pretty quickly becasue I WAS THERE and DIDN'T GET THE DEAL :)



It (PS3's market share) might hit 30%, but definently not more. ~ Neo

Flaming (Calling another user (any user) a fanboy is flaming.) ~ Machina-AX

Tony_Parker said:
Aiemond : I disagree. First, Sony is pretty happy with current PS3 sales. PS3 sells the same as the 360 worldwide but it's twice as expansive. Consumers see roughly twice more value in the PS3 right now, so my guess is the price is ok there too.

Second, if your way of thinking was true, Ipod and Iphones would have flopped. Features were poor for them compared to the price. It's all about design for this kind of products. And PSP Go looks a lot like an Iphone.

Sony is not happy with PS3 sales. They say that because it is PR. What do you think they are gonna come out and say "boy it selling like shit, too bad we can't catch the other two consoles."? It went from being market leader to being a third place console. How this can be classified as good by any means I do not know.  As for selling almost as much as MS.....do you remember last gen? This is a total failure, hell this will be in text books.

 

As for Apple, not only are they very good at marketing but they had a good phone. Ipod had itunes which was pushed heavily. When have we seen Sony do anything resembling good marketing this gen? I will be very suprised if the psp go is anything resembling a sucess. And by sucess I do not mean Sony PR comes out and says how happy they are with sales.



Now Playing: The Witcher (PC)

Consoles Owned: NES, SNES, N64, PS1, PS2, Wii, Xbox 360, Game Boy, DS

Euphoria14 said:

Could someone please explain this for me?

PSP 3000 is $169.99.
PSP Go is $249.99.

How is it a 68% increase in price (or double for some people) if the increase is $80 which isn't even 50% of 170?

Wouldn't the price increase actually be less than a 50% increase? FAR from the exaggerations I have been seeing here.

I quoted that figure from another poster. Maybe I misunderstood the figure he quoted, but I assure you, any misinformation was unintentional.

I wrote:

A. To me, and most people, saying "twice the price" is a figure of speech. 70 percent increase in price is, arguably, close enough, and in my opinion, it certainly is. I wasn't attempting to spread false information, and I figured the real increase was more like 50 percent. My point was you are paying more for less, which you are.

And yes, imo, a 12 precent decrease in screensize is detrimental to gaming. It certainly isn't good. It is a bit smaller than the difference between a 42 and a 50 inch HDTV, to give some point of reference. Again, I'm not good at math, but 12% is significant when it comes to screen size for me, at least.

...and percentages don't change the fact that it costs 80 dollars more for the machine. I would love to hear the pros about the console.



I don't need your console war.
It feeds the rich while it buries the poor.
You're power hungry, spinnin' stories, and bein' graphics whores.
I don't need your console war.

NO NO, NO NO NO.