umm at my schools

A - 100-80

B - 79-70

C - 69-60

D - 59-50

R (F for Americans) - 49-0

so a C+ is anywhere between a 67 and a 69

a c+ when i was in school was between a 77 - 79. which is a good score/grade

one reason I never care or use metacritic in any of my arguments, it's very inaccurate in reality.

Fuck 1UP and they're stupid anti-Wii bias. I wonder why people still take 1UP opinions seriously, they're the most Sony biased media in existance. All 1UP's reviews for Wii games are filled with rage, pessimism and obvious bias against it, they'll never promote a game that can help to change the image Nintendo have (as The Conduit, if successful will do), so they'll do their best to avoid that.

Yeah they did this to Disgaea 3 when it got a B-. Metacritic called it a 67.

One thing i can say having looked at this thread is that people can't agree with each other as to what a C+ is and no one seems to agree with my idea and experience.

At my school C- represented the limit of a passing grade which was generally 50% with a C+ usally being in the mid to high 60's.

In my first stint at Uni scoring was about the same as this but a C- might have included a grade in the high 40's. Getting an A on on the other hand was almost impossible and was often only given to 1-2% of students.

In my second stint at Uni we were given pass/fail only but the passing grade was set anywhere from 60-90% depending on the exam.

In the end i don't think we can get too angry at Metacritic for setting a C+ at 58% because it is different everywhere. We can however question the validity of assigning a numerical value to a graded score given the broad range of what a C+ means to different people in different places.

LOL. That is similar to the curve at UCSD for some classes.