ioi said: I think when someone writes "theres a special spot in hell for him. good riddance. ", "only thing I am gonna miss about him is not being able to see his face fall off after a few more surgeries", "the kids are safe" they know exactly what they're doing.
It is: - insensitive - infactual - inappropriate - inflammatory
No warning necessary. It is one thing saying "i didn't like his music", "don't like him as a person" or whatever but they didn't do that. |
I do agree with all those assesments, but the bans were for flaming, and the definition of flaming, per the forum rules is
"Insults. Attacking other users for any reason is never acceptable. This includes racism and bigotry. Do not insult someone's religion, race, sex, sexuality, nationality, political beliefs, or gaming preferences. Debate is encouraged, but respect the beliefs and opinions of others."
No other users were attacked. Also, these people were exercising free speech within the confines of the forum rules as they are written, I mean much worse things are said about entertainers, politicians, policeman, mailmen...you name it, and yet...nobody gets banned, how was anybody supposed to think that they would get banned for doing the same of an entertainer?
(WOT) I'm actually having fun here...and I can't believe I havn't been banned yet for arguing with the site owner