How dare you post a review over 7.0!!!!

This game can't be good as infamous is better than it apparently.

(This game IS good btw, very good in fact.)

Sometimes they don't even received a copy of the PS3 version, so even though the review is the same, they can't send out a review for a game they havn't played (PS3 version) just in case it has much worse graphics ect

IGN does it, Eurogamer does it, Edge does it, hell, GamingTrend does it. Why can't Gamespot? They're not going to send a review copy to the most popular reviewer in the world? (Yes, most popular. Sucks, I know).

Im sure it is since you've played infamous and finished it on your 360.......ohh w8.

infamous was an amazing game but after finishing it when i was good i really couldn't be stuffed to try out being bad seeing as the only real difference is a few powers and different cut scenes. where as i have already finished prototype and im about half way through my 2nd run on hard

jeesus slow down your gonna fly ahead of us in the race =P

My biggest complaint in prototype is the stealth system. Not that it's bad, but it's amazingly unrealistic. You can run around absorbing people right next to other people, there'll be people missing and weapons scattered throughout the floor but the soldiers won't mind. The AI when it comes to judging that your sneaking around is less than intelligent. It's down-right dumb.

That being said. 8.5 is a bit generous. I would give it a 7. It's average, a nice sandbox addition for 2009. But nothing spectular. Very average game.

Dude I love that about the game, everyone in the city besides you is oblivious! It's unrealistic but I also find extremely amusing.

Do you even get what I said? I hope you didn't take any of it seriously, part from the last line.

There had to be more cons then that.... an 8.5 for bad scenary and somewhat fiddley controls?