| alephnull said: If they can make the software development enviroment efficient enough im sure they could plonk a pretty unique architecture down on the developers plates and they'll eat it up. Bah, they could take the same sdk Sony uses right now call it cell.net or cell# and tomorrow you'd have a hoard of developers led by the CEO of valve proclaiming it to be the pinnacle of human achievement. My guess is that you weren't around for the early days of DirectX or visual studio or MFC or OLE. I've heard this a couple of times 'The best tool for PS3 development is an Xbox 360 development kit!' That's just silly. But I guess I now understand why there are so many crappy PS3 ports. I've never heard of anyone using MS's performance analysis tools even on a windows machine. |
"Like on the new 360 Pix, apparently you can edit shader code on the fly and rerun it, time it, see the results, rinse and repeat, all in pix. I haven't tried it yet, but I've heard that's how it works. Now, that is just too damn cool and useful for me not to use.
But yeah you are right, I could "tough it out", be hardcore, and stick to the PS3 way where I'd:
1) compile and run
2) setup the scene
3) run replay, capture and time
4) see the results
5) tweak the shader
6) go back to step 1
I could do that a few dozen times a day. Or...I could get a 360 dev kit again and just do it all in pix. Hmmmmmmm.....tough call eh? I'm sure there are some masochists out there that would prefer to tough it out. Me, I think I'll be asking for a 360 dev kit again once this project is done. Oddly, I'm finding out that a 360 dev kit is one of the better PS3 development tools."
http://forum.beyond3d.com/showpost.php?p=1193017&postcount=654 Joker454 a PS3/360 developer.
He also said in other places that the PS3 compiler is better because its much stricter in what it will accept, and its more likely to throw up errors and for people who are quite particular I guess thats a good thing.
1) Intel and I are on good terms for the moment. They are beating the snot out of AMD simply because their fabs seem to always be a year ahead of everyone else. Microsoft's monopoly on the other hand....
2) Didn't MS already port a stripped down version of windows to there newest version of WebTV sporting a ppc chip? What was that box called again? Oh, yeah the xbox 360.
3) I would never port anything to PowerPC. Thats for mac users. Real programmers don't use lowercase letters, hence all my code for my POWER machine is in FORTRAN running on AIX.
1. I blame IBM for not selling them good enough fabrication technologies! 
2. I was just about mention that, you beat me to it.
3. Does IBM make the POWER RANGERS? 
Tease.












