No
No
| megaman.2. said: ^Please do not accuse for something, I merely created this thread for discussion. Either contribute or dont its that easy ![]() |
I'm sure you did
anyway I'm out have fun
^please do state a reason.
<embed src="http://card.mygamercard.net/gears2goty/omar7700.swf" classid="clsid:D27CDB6E-AE6D-11cf-96B8-444553540000" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="198" height="135">
</embed>
| megaman.2. said: ^please do state a reason. |
I've yet to hear one from you...
megaman.2. is obviously trying to stir things up...even though he tries to sugarcoat it. Nobody is being fooled man....we see what you are trying to do.
SotC vs TP?
I think most people here have played both. My opinion no.
SotC was a fantastic game to be sure, but it had it's faults. Removing the good points of both SotC had more bad points that TP. Heres the differences
SotC blew. The controls trained you. They are unintuitive.
SotC overworld while gorgeous was unesasary. The big points of the game were the big bosses. SotC could have been imrpoved by using no hub, but instead just used a port to area. Then you go through an area to the arena.
TP isn't as free roaming as WW or OoT.
The hub lands while dull, aren't a waste of time like it was in SotC. TP made use of the large areas by including plains battles. SotC just had waste of space.
WW overworld. It was mostly bland, but you could walk away. You also gained the ability to quick travel down the road.
I haven't played Ico so I won't compare it to WW.
What SotC does better. Atmosphere. That group does a ancient world setting really well.
Squilliam: On Vgcharts its a commonly accepted practice to twist the bounds of plausibility in order to support your argument or agenda so I think its pretty cool that this gives me the precedent to say whatever I damn well please.
blegs1992 said:
|
Firstly I love Zelda but Shadow of the Colussus and Ico was truly something special, The quality of zelda has not been consistent and for that reason recently the Ico series has overtaken Zelda
<embed src="http://card.mygamercard.net/gears2goty/omar7700.swf" classid="clsid:D27CDB6E-AE6D-11cf-96B8-444553540000" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="198" height="135">
</embed>




| richardhutnik said: Team Ico is a development group. Zelda is a game series. Team Ico happens to do "artsy" adventure games, so they are themed the way Bioware does RPGs. Team Ico stuff doesn't even all have the same world, nor does it have a common name. |
Yes they are. In fact all three games appear to stem from one common overall storyline and not just be related by the fact that they are all in the same geographic area.
In general, most people would say Zelda is better
For me personally, I like Team Ico more.
...
Ico has had 2 games....Zelda has had countless (well..you can count but I can't be bothered). You can't measure consistency if x is a small digit. As x-> a large digit, then you can measure consistency. It's like at school or uni...I have one test and get a hell good mark, that doesn't mean I'm consistently good.
About Us |
Terms of Use |
Privacy Policy |
Advertise |
Staff |
Contact
Display As Desktop
Display As Mobile
© 2006-2025 VGChartz Ltd. All rights reserved.

