yea i'll just save them onto my computer and post them under Photobucket or something, that way it cannot change i guess, thanks for the advice anyways, i had no idea they changed the picture everyweek instead of adding new ones.

Umm, no that's fact.  It should be obvious but sales rankings do not tell you actual sales but only the highest-lowest order.  They alone cannot tell you whether a game had spetacular sales (though obviously being in the top 3  would point in the non-flop direction).  What they can reasonably tell you is that a game flopped.  If it debuts at #12 there is little question of that (#12 is pretty much always low selling although again it's not 100%). 

The problem with the top spots is that they are heavily dependent on time of year, what games came out, and other market factors.  1 week #1 may sell (using US numbers since I'm familiar with them) 400k and #2 200k which is pretty good for #2, another week #1 could sell 180k and #2 sells 60k which is not so good for a first week.  Another example would be SPM debuted at #3 in its first week in the UK and moved up to #1 its second week.  I seriously doubt that was due to sales increasing (though it could be since it is just a ranking).

Actually I'd say in ratio to hardware sales comparing to US sales trends, numbers 1 and 2 for Australian software would be at about (For these games in particular):

Paper Mario: 6,700

Heavenly Sword: 3,900

i don't know why you have to put that kind of stuff in the title, just let the numbers speak for themself.

 i just watched the movie Dr. Strangelove or: How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Bomb

and i kinda meant it as a pun, i guess you don't know what good movies are then!