Let him go man. He's obviously trying to rile you in. Supporting something is completely different to saying something else sucks (this has been said a few times now...some people just don't get it).

Who needs well thought out slogans when you have a pet sheep?

I'm really glad that TheSteve posted his response, because this is pretty much what I am saying:

Rainbird said: Pristine20 said: Rainbird said: Pristine20 said: Rainbird said: Because it's pure, concentrated fanboy-ism. I'm a Sony supporter, and I hate it too No it's not. Showing support for a console you own is quite different from putting down everyone else's choice which is fanboyism. I carried the logo myself for a while. i only removed it because I needed to make room for other things in my sig. The only reason I've ever been banned is sig length so i gotta be aware of this now. Yes it is. There are many ways of declaring your support towards a console, some of which do not involve declaring your console of choice as "the future", in a time where it obviously isn't. Whether you like it or not, that message reeks of blind fanboy-ism saying ps3 has room in the future is different from saying 360 and wii have no future...I hope this is clearer. IMO, the sig stems from the idea that ps3 was doomed that keeps popping up every now and then. Thankfully, many journalists think ninty's E3 sucked so they'll be talking about the wii now and the ps3 gets a break. It is clearer, but that is not what that signature is saying. Those are two different things

so what's your interpretation of the sig?

1. There are many ironic sigs out there (yours included), but these are directly insulting. 

2. Or, if I don't agree with your point of wiew, which is allowed, I chose to fight this stuff instead of changing my sig. How about that?

@hatmoza 2.0

The Black Sheep is back...i missed u man

@Rainbird

Not believing in the PS3 or its future is fine, but why hate those ho do??

I kinda get what Rainbird is saying...perhaps the sig should´ve been more like "PS3 has a bright future...BELIEVE"....instead of "is the future", which could imply the future is all about the PS3.

Pristine20 said: Rainbird said: Pristine20 said: Rainbird said: Pristine20 said: Rainbird said: Because it's pure, concentrated fanboy-ism. I'm a Sony supporter, and I hate it too No it's not. Showing support for a console you own is quite different from putting down everyone else's choice which is fanboyism. I carried the logo myself for a while. i only removed it because I needed to make room for other things in my sig. The only reason I've ever been banned is sig length so i gotta be aware of this now. Yes it is. There are many ways of declaring your support towards a console, some of which do not involve declaring your console of choice as "the future", in a time where it obviously isn't. Whether you like it or not, that message reeks of blind fanboy-ism saying ps3 has room in the future is different from saying 360 and wii have no future...I hope this is clearer. IMO, the sig stems from the idea that ps3 was doomed that keeps popping up every now and then. Thankfully, many journalists think ninty's E3 sucked so they'll be talking about the wii now and the ps3 gets a break. It is clearer, but that is not what that signature is saying. Those are two different things so what's your interpretation of the sig?

PS3 is the future of console gaming, now join our crazy cult.

Something like that

For the same reasons you get tired of people saying that the Wii is a fad, and stuff like that.

I'm at the point where I have given up on fighting it, and just roll my eyes whenever I see it. Often I feel like posting facepalms, but that probably wont do much good.

Rainbird said: Pristine20 said: Rainbird said: Pristine20 said: Rainbird said: Pristine20 said: Rainbird said: Because it's pure, concentrated fanboy-ism. I'm a Sony supporter, and I hate it too No it's not. Showing support for a console you own is quite different from putting down everyone else's choice which is fanboyism. I carried the logo myself for a while. i only removed it because I needed to make room for other things in my sig. The only reason I've ever been banned is sig length so i gotta be aware of this now. Yes it is. There are many ways of declaring your support towards a console, some of which do not involve declaring your console of choice as "the future", in a time where it obviously isn't. Whether you like it or not, that message reeks of blind fanboy-ism saying ps3 has room in the future is different from saying 360 and wii have no future...I hope this is clearer. IMO, the sig stems from the idea that ps3 was doomed that keeps popping up every now and then. Thankfully, many journalists think ninty's E3 sucked so they'll be talking about the wii now and the ps3 gets a break. It is clearer, but that is not what that signature is saying. Those are two different things so what's your interpretation of the sig? PS3 is the future of console gaming, now join our crazy cult. Something like that

In that case, I guess the problem here is the vagueness of the statement because it looks like everyone's inner prejudice brings forth a different interpretation. Spartanfx (original author...I think) should've had something more direct.