Griffin said:
Keep_the_change said:
Griffin said: Its better then WM+ but worse then what MS has, so who really cares. I see no use for them in normal gaming. |
WM+ is already 100% accurate. So it is as accurate as it, or is worse. You can't be more accurate then 100%.
And I don't wanna see what happens if you cover the purple head of the device.
|
wm+ is not 100% go watch the videos where you can see them moving while the stuff is going on screen.
|
And that is due to developer choice, not WM+ capabilities. The WM+ is 1:1, just like Playstation Motion thingy.
@topic
my thoughts on both MS and Sony is they shouldn't have shown them. Neither is coming out within the year, and had no real games to demo with them. MS's is interesting since it is different, but they didn't prove it could work for core games, and Sony's is a joke due to being a knockoff of both systems. Also the fact that I have to buy the 100% useless PSEye wouldn't make me happy if a game I wanted required the motion controller.
Had both of them waited til they could show something more than MSPaint capabilities and car racers, like a real game that was going to be released they would have gone over 1000x better with the press and general audiences.
My guess is they both fear Nintendo with WM+ so they threw something together as fast as they could even if it wasn't going to be out for another year.