By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - RUMOR - Apple looking to takeover EA?

Finnbar said:
Doesn't Nintendo also have something like 20+ billion on hand?

ot: If this did happen this would be a pretty big strike against their largest competitor.
The SIMS 3...Apple Games

P.S Should we be calling Apple, Apple or Mac? is the company called Apple and the comps are Mac? Iv never really known.

 

I don´t think Nintendo has any intentions of purchasing EA.There are a very conservative company.



Around the Network
Killergran said:
Fei-Hung said:
well wouldn't aquiring EA be a good investment?

not only can they make money, but they can also:

1. increase their company portfolio
2. create better games for the iphone and itouch
3. make exclusive mobile games
4. gain better experience and insight into the big league gaming industry
5. maybe improve gaming for macs
6. increase brand awareness
7. get paid by rivals (ms&sony).

im sure there are more reasons but my bladder is about to burst :s

You run past the most important point here. Can they make money off a decision like that?

With that in mind, let's take a quick look at your numbered list:

1. Will EA portion of that portfolio make more money after being taken over?
2. Will EA games for iPhone/iTouch (iP/iT) sell better than their current counterparts?
3. Will exclusive EA games raise the value of iP/iT?
4. Does Apple really want to get into the software industry?
5. Is buying EA money better spent than moneyhatting?
6. How on earth would a merger increase brand awareness?
7. You'll have to explain this one to me as well.

 

The real question is, where would EA benefit from this arrangement? Because if EA doesn't make as much money as before, then Apple has paid for future profits they'll never recieve. And Apple would have to get some serious profits from this arrangements to compensate for that.

 

I think you mean game industry, cause they have been a leader in the software industry for ages.... final cut would like a word with you 

 



come play minecraft @  mcg.hansrotech.com

minecraft name: hansrotec

XBL name: Goddog

goddog said:

I think you mean game industry, cause they have been a leader in the software industry for ages.... final cut would like a word with you 

Media industry?

Gaming software industry?

Apple creates platforms, not content. It's part of what makes them successfull.



This is invisible text!

Killergran said:
goddog said:

I think you mean game industry, cause they have been a leader in the software industry for ages.... final cut would like a word with you 

Media industry?

Gaming software industry?

Apple creates platforms, not content. It's part of what makes them successfull.

 

well played         I could list the entire back portfolio or just whats  for sale now, either way it covers pretty much the same areas as MS. with the noted exception of video/computer game production. and apple does have a history of buy companies/applications to break into an industry.... Itunes bought, final cut bought, OSX bought,  granted all of those were rough and not  recognizable as what we use today or even recognizable from when they were bought to when apple first used it as an apple product (well except OSX 10.0 looked alot like nextstep with just a bit more polish and alot less stability )



come play minecraft @  mcg.hansrotech.com

minecraft name: hansrotec

XBL name: Goddog

I hope it's true because I don't like EA nor Apple, but it would be exciting with a fourth competitor in the console war.



Around the Network

Micheal Pachter chimes in on the Apple/EA rumor.  He agrees that it does not make much sense.

Wedbush Morgan analyst Michael Pachter is highly skeptical of such talk, however. "Sounds retarded to me," he tells Gamasutra.

"Apple could buy Warner Music for around $3 billion, and control 20 percent of all recorded music," he says. "That makes more sense to their current business model than buying EA for more than twice that, doesn't it?"

"I don't want to start a rumor, but want to point out that Apple doesn't own
any entertainment content," adds the analyst, "so I don't know why they would feel compelled to enter a new business unrelated to their current product slate."

 

 



goddog said:

well played         I could list the entire back portfolio or just whats  for sale now, either way it covers pretty much the same areas as MS. with the noted exception of video/computer game production. and apple does have a history of buy companies/applications to break into an industry.... Itunes bought, final cut bought, OSX bought,  granted all of those were rough and not  recognizable as what we use today or even recognizable from when they were bought to when apple first used it as an apple product (well except OSX 10.0 looked alot like nextstep with just a bit more polish and alot less stability )

Right. But what would the point be to buy EA? It's value would decrease a lot if they only made stuff for apple platforms, and it would be much much cheaper to moneyhat for the content if that's what you want.

They're not competing with each other, so you don't eliminate a competitor. They're not working with each other, so there wouldn't really be any integration. EA has nothing that Apple wants. And the two companies have, as far as I know, radically different corporate cultures, ideologies, goals and strategies. So what, really, is the potential upside?

AppStore has proved a monumental success for Apple, as well as iTunes. Why move away from this new approach and go back to the old way? It feels like it would go against everything Apple stands for.

 

...

 

Nintendo on the other hand, that I could see. That would have a much bigger potential for catastrophy, but could also make for gigantic success. :) I think.



This is invisible text!

EA isn't actually making any money - they are just losing heaps of it. Apple would have much better take over targets.

Part of the reason the AppStore business model is successful, is that Apple are NOT Nintendo - they are not dominating everyone else with their software.

Apple could do exactly the same thing as the iTouch, just on a bigger scale (i.e. larger device) - basically a PSP style device.

It would have iTunes, AppStore, and also have dedicated applications. It would run OSX. All they need is to improve their handheld tech (the iTouch/iPhone is actually fairly 'low-tech', just really well presented). They are hiring now the people they need for this.



Gesta Non Verba

Nocturnal is helping companies get cheaper game ratings in Australia:

Game Assessment website

Wii code: 2263 4706 2910 1099

WiiStation360 said:

Micheal Pachter chimes in on the Apple/EA rumor.  He agrees that it does not make much sense.

Wedbush Morgan analyst Michael Pachter is highly skeptical of such talk, however. "Sounds retarded to me," he tells Gamasutra.

"Apple could buy Warner Music for around $3 billion, and control 20 percent of all recorded music," he says. "That makes more sense to their current business model than buying EA for more than twice that, doesn't it?"

"I don't want to start a rumor, but want to point out that Apple doesn't own
any entertainment content," adds the analyst, "so I don't know why they would feel compelled to enter a new business unrelated to their current product slate."

 

 

While I certainly do not think Pacther's word choice describing this rumored transaction is in any way shape or form approrprirate, the sentiment is essentially correct.

Apple distributes the content of others over networks using propriatory software and hardware.

EA distributes essentially the same software (games) over a variety of hardware platforms.

This not only does not mesh well from business perspective, but there is a potential clash of corporate cultures.

 

Mike from Morgantown

 



      


I am Mario.


I like to jump around, and would lead a fairly serene and aimless existence if it weren't for my friends always getting into trouble. I love to help out, even when it puts me at risk. I seem to make friends with people who just can't stay out of trouble.

Wii Friend Code: 1624 6601 1126 1492

NNID: Mike_INTV

mike_intellivision said:
WiiStation360 said:

Micheal Pachter chimes in on the Apple/EA rumor.  He agrees that it does not make much sense.

Wedbush Morgan analyst Michael Pachter is highly skeptical of such talk, however. "Sounds retarded to me," he tells Gamasutra.

"Apple could buy Warner Music for around $3 billion, and control 20 percent of all recorded music," he says. "That makes more sense to their current business model than buying EA for more than twice that, doesn't it?"

"I don't want to start a rumor, but want to point out that Apple doesn't own
any entertainment content," adds the analyst, "so I don't know why they would feel compelled to enter a new business unrelated to their current product slate."

 

 

While I certainly do not think Pacther's word choice describing this rumored transaction is in any way shape or form approrprirate, the sentiment is essentially correct.

Apple distributes the content of others over networks using propriatory software and hardware.

EA distributes essentially the same software (games) over a variety of hardware platforms.

This not only does not mesh well from business perspective, but there is a potential clash of corporate cultures.

 

Mike from Morgantown

 

 

 

Pachter is quite often wrong on his predictions...almost frightening wrong, but in this case, it isn't a prediction, and he's spot on about this.  Apple has craved a nice niche in music, and they are coming under pressure in that arena, so to diversify to other area that you totally lack any competentcy would either prove to be absolutely brilliant or the dumbest move in business.



"...You can't kill ideas with a sword, and you can't sink belief structures with a broadside. You defeat them by making them change..."

- From By Schism Rent Asunder