I'll trust that if/when the beyond3d guys confirm it. They've been 100% accurate as far as I've seen.

I seriously doubt it. Also the detail in the comparison shots wouldn't be accurate as detail would be lost in downsizing the image no matter what you used to upscale it back again. Until we see native 720p and 1080p shots from a HD capture source then it's just upscaling trickery.

Yay! I had that pic as my iPhone background. Glad to find a 1080p one though.

It'd be even better for a 1200p one though.

Wow. All this fuss about that small of an improvement? It took me switching back and forth for a minute to actually notice. I'm really underwhelmed.

The different was pretty obvious in the hair part. Were you looking at the images in full size? (most browsers crop it to the window size unless you zoom in)

I can't tell any difference other than the hair though...

Tagged so I can steal the wallpaper @ home >_>

Hey! Its FF13, every small tiny detail added to this game deserves 14 pages of hype!

The 360 can output 480p, 576p (UK), 720p, 1080i, 1080p on HDMI and Component.  1080p support on Component though is limited due to the fact most TV's don't support it.  On VGA it will display the following resolutions 640 x 480, 848 x 480, 1024 x 768, 1280 x 720, 1280 x 768, 1280 x 1024, 1360 x 768, 1440 x 900, 1680 x 1050, 1920 x 1080.

Most games on the 360 like the PS3 are made to run at 720p (1280x720) so whenever either console displays at 1080p for the vast majority of games they're upscaled to that resolution.  There are some games which support 1080p native rendering such as Virtua Tennis, Wipeout HD?, also GT5 I believe does render very close but not quite the full monty.

Not sure if the 360 supports specific resolutions like VGA over the HDMI connection as I don't have a HDMI port on mine.

I saw a difference in the eyes and the skin beneath the eyes.

Lets wait to see if its true, but if it is, wow