By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Sony - MAG screenshots - So ugly my eyes burn, oh they burn!

EaglesEye379 on 29 April 2009

forevercloud3000 said:

 

Why are other console owners(the fanboy type) so irritated by PS3 owner's "Holier then thou" attitude?  Its not like it effects anything you own. Because you are jealous of what we have thats why. We feel we made a better consious decision then the rest of you lot, and people like you feel we did as well but refuse to admit it so you spend your time trying to bring down our happiness.

 



 

forevercloud3000 said:

 

What is wrong with these idiots these days. This was once the same company that put out a AAAA game every year with VII,VIII,IX, etc. The company that was known as the KING of JRPGs for years.

At the start of this gen they were on a set path for glory. They boasted FFXIII as PS3 exclusive, as well as Versus and Agito(for PSP and cellphone). Now a few years have passed. SE has released not 1, not 2, but 3 games(Last Remnant, Infinite Undiscovery, Star Ocean The Last Hope) exclusively for a system that their main fanbase will not imbrace.

Their sales are through the floor, with only remakes keeping them afloat. They keep treading the same road that has proven un successful to them (X360 only) when it comes to JRPG sales.

Constant promises made and broken:FFXIII's exclusivity to PS3 crushed to dust and made MP. Last Remnant promised to be SIMILTANEOUS MULTIPLATFORM RELEASE for PS3 and X360. The game has YET to grace the PS3 platform after several months, it even has reached PC first.

They seem to be down right disrespecting their fanbase by not releasing a SINGLE PS3 game yet. You know, the system that revitalized Square's fame in the first place when VII came out, THe system made by the company that has bailed them out of some seriously risky deals such as leaving Nintendo for the better or keeping them afloat during the Spirits Within Fiasco(at least till they merged with Enix).

They also just dodge the questions when someone asks them about what the hell they are doing...

http://blog.wired.com/games/2009/03/gdc-the-last-re.html

Square Enix has trully lost all respect from gamers.

 

 

 

 

Whos bringing down whos happiness and who seems more jealous? There are millions of 360 owners who are very happy with what SE has put out so far and are extremely happy that they will get to enjoy FFXIII. 

 

Sorry I know unrelated to thread but just had to.



Around the Network
theRepublic on 29 April 2009
S.T.A.G.E. said:
Euphoria14 said:
S.T.A.G.E. said:
waron said:
personally
gameplay>graphics
i'm more worried that this game will be unplayable thanks to maps were you will be killed 2 seconds after respawn by stray bullet or campers(this game can end up as a "run to the nearest safe spot and kill everything that respawns/move wit sniper rifle" campers game).
i don't care about the graphics as long as it have stellar framerate, won't have glitches and will be "clean"(no bad textures, models etc. and everything at the same level).
for me even first gen 360 games like Perfect Dark Zero looks good.

 

EXACTLY! A shooter that requires 256 players also requires little skill to have many kills!

What would require more skill to consistently come out on top? A 1 vs 1, 10 player DM, 32 player DM or a 8 vs 8 x 16 TDM?

I wouldn't know, but I am hoping someone else does. All I know is that I won't touch a game like this with a 10-foot pole. Killzone 2 was way too intense for me and it was 32 players. This game would make me rip my hair out.

 

A one vs one is too obvious that one person will win. 32 player DM sounds about right. It's the truth man, i've been playing FPS for years and with 256 players on the map its going to be a spawn kill fest. I'm not saying don't buy it, i'm just giving my opinion from experience. KZ2 had the right amount of players, which is why everything turned out well. You can have players who are valued on your team by true skill. The battlefields are wide enough and that is a plus for KZ2. MAG is going to be a gigantic clusterfuck. Question though....how was KZ2 too intense? Man if that was intense you would've hated the old Call of Duty games lol.

 

As long as the map is big enough, 256 players would theoretically play just fine.  The question is how big are the maps going to be.



Switch Code: SW-7377-9189-3397 -- Nintendo Network ID: theRepublic -- Steam ID: theRepublic

Now Playing
Switch - Super Mario Maker 2 (2019)
3DS - Phoenix Wright: Ace Attorney (Trilogy) (2005/2014)
Mobile - Yugioh Duel Links (2017)
Mobile - Super Mario Run (2017)
PC - Borderlands 2 (2012)
PC - Deep Rock Galactic (2020)

Griffin on 29 April 2009
S.T.A.G.E. said:
Griffin said:

LoL at this whole thread, the game blows away CoD4 which i played to death on the PS3. And CoD:WaW which i played many times on the 360. I can find better looking textures in an N64 game then what i can find in Cod and that's a fact.

But i have no plans to buy this game and will be buying CoD6 this year and will be killing you all online

 

Nice contradiction post. :)

I just like the controls in the CoD series.  Sony FPS games have never been known for great controls, just look at KZ2 or R2.  Horrible broken controls.

 



Aldro on 29 April 2009

OMG
PS3 = 256 players online on MAG
X360 = 360 players online on ? :OO (XD)



Akvod on 29 April 2009
S.T.A.G.E. said:
Euphoria14 said:
S.T.A.G.E. said:
waron said:
personally
gameplay>graphics
i'm more worried that this game will be unplayable thanks to maps were you will be killed 2 seconds after respawn by stray bullet or campers(this game can end up as a "run to the nearest safe spot and kill everything that respawns/move wit sniper rifle" campers game).
i don't care about the graphics as long as it have stellar framerate, won't have glitches and will be "clean"(no bad textures, models etc. and everything at the same level).
for me even first gen 360 games like Perfect Dark Zero looks good.

 

EXACTLY! A shooter that requires 256 players also requires little skill to have many kills!

What would require more skill to consistently come out on top? A 1 vs 1, 10 player DM, 32 player DM or a 8 vs 8 x 16 TDM?

I wouldn't know, but I am hoping someone else does. All I know is that I won't touch a game like this with a 10-foot pole. Killzone 2 was way too intense for me and it was 32 players. This game would make me rip my hair out.

 

A one vs one is too obvious that one person will win. 32 player DM sounds about right. It's the truth man, i've been playing FPS for years and with 256 players on the map its going to be a spawn kill fest. I'm not saying don't buy it, i'm just giving my opinion from experience. KZ2 had the right amount of players, which is why everything turned out well. You can have players who are valued on your team by true skill. The battlefields are wide enough and that is a plus for KZ2. MAG is going to be a gigantic clusterfuck. Question though....how was KZ2 too intense? Man if that was intense you would've hated the old Call of Duty games lol.

 

I disagree, because from what the game title sudgest and what Zipper promises us, the maps are going to be HUGE. As long as the map size:player size ratio is right, then the final factor that should matter is the spawn system.



Around the Network
Loud_Hot_White_Box on 29 April 2009
EaglesEye379 said:

forevercloud3000 said:

 

Why are other console owners(the fanboy type) so irritated by PS3 owner's "Holier then thou" attitude?  Its not like it effects anything you own. Because you are jealous of what we have thats why. We feel we made a better consious decision then the rest of you lot, and people like you feel we did as well but refuse to admit it so you spend your time trying to bring down our happiness.

 



 

forevercloud3000 said:

 

What is wrong with these idiots these days. This was once the same company that put out a AAAA game every year with VII,VIII,IX, etc. The company that was known as the KING of JRPGs for years.

At the start of this gen they were on a set path for glory. They boasted FFXIII as PS3 exclusive, as well as Versus and Agito(for PSP and cellphone). Now a few years have passed. SE has released not 1, not 2, but 3 games(Last Remnant, Infinite Undiscovery, Star Ocean The Last Hope) exclusively for a system that their main fanbase will not imbrace.

Their sales are through the floor, with only remakes keeping them afloat. They keep treading the same road that has proven un successful to them (X360 only) when it comes to JRPG sales.

Constant promises made and broken:FFXIII's exclusivity to PS3 crushed to dust and made MP. Last Remnant promised to be SIMILTANEOUS MULTIPLATFORM RELEASE for PS3 and X360. The game has YET to grace the PS3 platform after several months, it even has reached PC first.

They seem to be down right disrespecting their fanbase by not releasing a SINGLE PS3 game yet. You know, the system that revitalized Square's fame in the first place when VII came out, THe system made by the company that has bailed them out of some seriously risky deals such as leaving Nintendo for the better or keeping them afloat during the Spirits Within Fiasco(at least till they merged with Enix).

They also just dodge the questions when someone asks them about what the hell they are doing...

http://blog.wired.com/games/2009/03/gdc-the-last-re.html

Square Enix has trully lost all respect from gamers.

 

 

 

 

Whos bringing down whos happiness and who seems more jealous? There are millions of 360 owners who are very happy with what SE has put out so far and are extremely happy that they will get to enjoy FFXIII. 

 

Sorry I know unrelated to thread but just had to.

 

His point was that it sucked that SE hadn't put out a PS3 game, not that he hated that any games came out for 360.  Nice try though.



Mirson on 29 April 2009
forevercloud3000 said:
Xbot said:
genji, mobile suit gundam, super rub a dub, eye of judement, lair, haze, time crisis 4, socom, singstar. ps3 is full of flops.

 

ppl like those games, just that not many people played them. And I wasn't going to get into downloadables for the most part. In that case I could list off the entire Xbox Arcade, full of mediocre rubbish.

 No matter how you spin it, 360 has more "flops" then PS3 does.

The same can be applied to the 360 games you listed.

Of course 360 has more flops: it's been out longer and has more support, but the thing is many, if not all, of the 360 "flops" weren't hyped as a killer app unlike Lair and Haze.



Ajescent on 29 April 2009

"my eyes burn, oh they burn"

wow...gamers today are spoiled elitists.



PS One/2/p/3slim/Vita owner. I survived the Apocalyps3/Collaps3 and all I got was this lousy signature.


Xbox One: What are you doing Dave?

Griffin on 29 April 2009
Mirson said:
forevercloud3000 said:
Xbot said:
genji, mobile suit gundam, super rub a dub, eye of judement, lair, haze, time crisis 4, socom, singstar. ps3 is full of flops.

 

ppl like those games, just that not many people played them. And I wasn't going to get into downloadables for the most part. In that case I could list off the entire Xbox Arcade, full of mediocre rubbish.

 No matter how you spin it, 360 has more "flops" then PS3 does.

The same can be applied to the 360 games you listed.

Of course 360 has more flops: it's been out longer and has more support, but the thing is many, if not all, of the 360 "flops" weren't hyped as a killer app unlike Lair and Haze.

Haze was hyped by all sides when first shown, but after no improvements were made and the game kept getting delayed nobody gave a shit about it.

Lair was being made by a game dev with a proven record, a game where you can control a dragon and rain down destruction in massive worlds is bound to be hyped no matter the system.



S.T.A.G.E. on 29 April 2009
theRepublic said:
S.T.A.G.E. said:
Euphoria14 said:
S.T.A.G.E. said:
waron said:
personally
gameplay>graphics
i'm more worried that this game will be unplayable thanks to maps were you will be killed 2 seconds after respawn by stray bullet or campers(this game can end up as a "run to the nearest safe spot and kill everything that respawns/move wit sniper rifle" campers game).
i don't care about the graphics as long as it have stellar framerate, won't have glitches and will be "clean"(no bad textures, models etc. and everything at the same level).
for me even first gen 360 games like Perfect Dark Zero looks good.

 

EXACTLY! A shooter that requires 256 players also requires little skill to have many kills!

What would require more skill to consistently come out on top? A 1 vs 1, 10 player DM, 32 player DM or a 8 vs 8 x 16 TDM?

I wouldn't know, but I am hoping someone else does. All I know is that I won't touch a game like this with a 10-foot pole. Killzone 2 was way too intense for me and it was 32 players. This game would make me rip my hair out.

 

A one vs one is too obvious that one person will win. 32 player DM sounds about right. It's the truth man, i've been playing FPS for years and with 256 players on the map its going to be a spawn kill fest. I'm not saying don't buy it, i'm just giving my opinion from experience. KZ2 had the right amount of players, which is why everything turned out well. You can have players who are valued on your team by true skill. The battlefields are wide enough and that is a plus for KZ2. MAG is going to be a gigantic clusterfuck. Question though....how was KZ2 too intense? Man if that was intense you would've hated the old Call of Duty games lol.

 

As long as the map is big enough, 256 players would theoretically play just fine.  The question is how big are the maps going to be.

 


Well from what i've seen the maps should be huge, but I noticed in the video that the players tend to flood certain areas. I saw like 30 guys on one side rushing another group of guys on the opposite team. It looks like a BF2 rip off.