By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - General - Russia: Waterboarding is for sissies

This reminds me of a lesson I and many Americans have learned the hard way:


Arguing with idiots, ignorance, and/or arrogance never pans out and should be ignored...just don't let them make the decisions.



Explanation of sig:

I am a Pakistani.....my name is Dan....how hard is that? (Don't ask about the 101...apparantely there are more of me out there....)

Around the Network

You didn't give Eastern Europe to Stalin. In fact, he gave west berlin to... the West.



 

 

highwaystar101 said:
This isn't a victory in any way for pro waterboarders I want to make that clear.

But basically Russia are a horrible country, they have extremely bad human rights ethics and their torturing needs to stop. As well as all torture, but let's fry the big fish first.

But I'm going to say something along the lines of what Akuma said, but in a different context.

Saying you are good on human rights because you are better than russia is like saying Hitler was a loveable friendly character because he killed less people than Stalin. It's just not true no matter which way you put it.

Waterboarding is still torture

 

WTF man? You should be banned just as that guy whom attacked Iraq in the exact same manner as you did now ;)

 

You have absolutly no freaking idea whats going on in Russia or any ex-soviet state and all that you are saying here comes from bullshit western media. Dont judge something afther the general publics opinion because that only makes you a tool...

 

Yes, it might not be paradise, true, but seeing that it pretty much became what it is today in less then 18 years... thats just impressive.

 

And again, for people who bealive that the russian media is framed and not free... please... did you ever went out and bought a newspaper in russia? Because I highly doubt it ;) And the crap that they write about their leader is something that just couldent be possible in a non-democratic country ;)

 

Torture... well yes... thats something that should be eradicated in every country, but lets e honest... its something that will never go away untill humanity exists, like it or not...



Vote the Mayor for Mayor!

hunter_alien said:
highwaystar101 said:
This isn't a victory in any way for pro waterboarders I want to make that clear.

But basically Russia are a horrible country, they have extremely bad human rights ethics and their torturing needs to stop. As well as all torture, but let's fry the big fish first.

But I'm going to say something along the lines of what Akuma said, but in a different context.

Saying you are good on human rights because you are better than russia is like saying Hitler was a loveable friendly character because he killed less people than Stalin. It's just not true no matter which way you put it.

Waterboarding is still torture

 

WTF man? You should be banned just as that guy whom attacked Iraq in the exact same manner as you did now ;)

 

You have absolutly no freaking idea whats going on in Russia or any ex-soviet state and all that you are saying here comes from bullshit western media. Dont judge something afther the general publics opinion because that only makes you a tool...

 

Yes, it might not be paradise, true, but seeing that it pretty much became what it is today in less then 18 years... thats just impressive.

 

And again, for people who bealive that the russian media is framed and not free... please... did you ever went out and bought a newspaper in russia? Because I highly doubt it ;) And the crap that they write about their leader is something that just couldent be possible in a non-democratic country ;)

 

Torture... well yes... thats something that should be eradicated in every country, but lets e honest... its something that will never go away untill humanity exists, like it or not...

 

Though I agree that torture will always exist, I don't believe people object to it in order to eradicate it from our nature...we object to it in order to preserve our sanity and humanity, because once you become compliant to such behavior as torture, you start to lose that humanity ...

 



Explanation of sig:

I am a Pakistani.....my name is Dan....how hard is that? (Don't ask about the 101...apparantely there are more of me out there....)

Tyrannical said:
yanamaster said:
Tyrannical said:

I'm sorry. I guess we didn't make it to Poland in time.

Actually it's not that you didn't make it in time. you just chose not to. and that's a proven historical fact that most people don't talk about out of political correctness. We were basically handed over to Stalin.

Oh and one thing, stay in the Us. We really don't need your personal phobias here.

 

 I know, and it was a horrible thing to hand eastern Europe over to the communists. It was a foolish, foolish, move on FDRs part that set the world up for 40 years of cold war. In fact, we wouldn't have most of the word's problems today if we didn't stop the tanks until we rolled into Moscow.

Which reminds me of a joke I sometimes use in meetings when one side seems too unwilling to compromise.

Listen Stalin, this isn't Yalta. You can't have everything you want.

OMG... thats just stupid :)) My god... run down Moscow with what? ^_^

 



Vote the Mayor for Mayor!

Around the Network
hunter_alien said:
highwaystar101 said:
This isn't a victory in any way for pro waterboarders I want to make that clear.

But basically Russia are a horrible country, they have extremely bad human rights ethics and their torturing needs to stop. As well as all torture, but let's fry the big fish first.

But I'm going to say something along the lines of what Akuma said, but in a different context.

Saying you are good on human rights because you are better than russia is like saying Hitler was a loveable friendly character because he killed less people than Stalin. It's just not true no matter which way you put it.

Waterboarding is still torture

 

WTF man? You should be banned just as that guy whom attacked Iraq in the exact same manner as you did now ;)

 

You have absolutly no freaking idea whats going on in Russia or any ex-soviet state and all that you are saying here comes from bullshit western media. Dont judge something afther the general publics opinion because that only makes you a tool...

 

Yes, it might not be paradise, true, but seeing that it pretty much became what it is today in less then 18 years... thats just impressive.

 

And again, for people who bealive that the russian media is framed and not free... please... did you ever went out and bought a newspaper in russia? Because I highly doubt it ;) And the crap that they write about their leader is something that just couldent be possible in a non-democratic country ;)

 

Torture... well yes... thats something that should be eradicated in every country, but lets e honest... its something that will never go away untill humanity exists, like it or not...

 

*Sigh* Not you too, read the thread, it's put into context in the posts I make and you will see what I mean.

--edit--

you don't think I'm american too right??? I'm not American at all.



hunter_alien said:
Tyrannical said:

 

 I know, and it was a horrible thing to hand eastern Europe over to the communists. It was a foolish, foolish, move on FDRs part that set the world up for 40 years of cold war. In fact, we wouldn't have most of the word's problems today if we didn't stop the tanks until we rolled into Moscow.

Which reminds me of a joke I sometimes use in meetings when one side seems too unwilling to compromise.

Listen Stalin, this isn't Yalta. You can't have everything you want.

OMG... thats just stupid :)) My god... run down Moscow with what? ^_^

 

Well, I suppose I could borrow a quote from Civilization, "We back our threats with nuclear weapons", but the simple truth is that the US was at the height of it's millitary power at the end of WWII. Russia as well as the rest of Europe was exhausted. The US's industrial base and population base was untouched during the war. If the US said to Russia, no you may not have eastern Europe nor may you influence east Asia, Russia could do nothing to stop it.

 



Yet, today, America's leaders are reenacting every folly that brought these great powers [Russia, Germany, and Japan] to ruin -- from arrogance and hubris, to assertions of global hegemony, to imperial overstretch, to trumpeting new 'crusades,' to handing out war guarantees to regions and countries where Americans have never fought before. We are piling up the kind of commitments that produced the greatest disasters of the twentieth century.
 — Pat Buchanan – A Republic, Not an Empire

Tyrannical said:
hunter_alien said:
Tyrannical said:

 

 I know, and it was a horrible thing to hand eastern Europe over to the communists. It was a foolish, foolish, move on FDRs part that set the world up for 40 years of cold war. In fact, we wouldn't have most of the word's problems today if we didn't stop the tanks until we rolled into Moscow.

Which reminds me of a joke I sometimes use in meetings when one side seems too unwilling to compromise.

Listen Stalin, this isn't Yalta. You can't have everything you want.

OMG... thats just stupid :)) My god... run down Moscow with what? ^_^

 

Well, I suppose I could borrow a quote from Civilization, "We back our threats with nuclear weapons", but the simple truth is that the US was at the height of it's millitary power at the end of WWII. Russia as well as the rest of Europe was exhausted. The US's industrial base and population base was untouched during the war. If the US said to Russia, no you may not have eastern Europe nor may you influence east Asia, Russia could do nothing to stop it.

 

 

Wow... if you really do bealive that this is true, then my friend we have nothing to discuss because you are then probably the most blind person ever. The reason Japan surrendered was not because the atomic bomb... that was the final drop. They had nothing left to protect themselves, they where trully exhausted... and all they had left was their tiny island. Now do you trully bealive that dropping a nuclear bomb on Moscow ( a city that was in ruins btw) would have made the russians give up the entire eastern europe? The US barely had troops in mainland europe by the time the war was over. The russian army was by far bigger, and back then land combat was still arguably the dominative one during a war... If the US would have kept pushing the front in matter of months their already not stable economy would have went down the hill my friend ;)

 

Highway: no... I know that your not an american :P You made that one clear many times before :))



Vote the Mayor for Mayor!

lol...the welfare state begging the US to supply it with weapons and vehicles was going to win against the US?



"I like my steaks how i like my women.  Bloody and all over my face"

"Its like sex, but with a winner!"

MrBubbles Review Threads: Bill Gates, Jak II, Kingdom Hearts II, The Strangers, Sly 2, Crackdown, Zohan, Quarantine, Klungo Sssavesss Teh World, MS@E3'08, WATCHMEN(movie), Shadow of the Colossus, The Saboteur

hunter_alien said:
Tyrannical said:

Well, I suppose I could borrow a quote from Civilization, "We back our threats with nuclear weapons", but the simple truth is that the US was at the height of it's millitary power at the end of WWII. Russia as well as the rest of Europe was exhausted. The US's industrial base and population base was untouched during the war. If the US said to Russia, no you may not have eastern Europe nor may you influence east Asia, Russia could do nothing to stop it.

 

 

Wow... if you really do bealive that this is true, then my friend we have nothing to discuss because you are then probably the most blind person ever. The reason Japan surrendered was not because the atomic bomb... that was the final drop. They had nothing left to protect themselves, they where trully exhausted... and all they had left was their tiny island. Now do you trully bealive that dropping a nuclear bomb on Moscow ( a city that was in ruins btw) would have made the russians give up the entire eastern europe? The US barely had troops in mainland europe by the time the war was over. The russian army was by far bigger, and back then land combat was still arguably the dominative one during a war... If the US would have kept pushing the front in matter of months their already not stable economy would have went down the hill my friend ;)

 

Well, only since you insist on bringing it up.

Of course Japan was exhausted near the end of the war. It took two atomic bombs to convince them that they were however. But once their navy and air force were destroyed and the US had island airbases within range of the mainland it was all over.

 

I’m not sure Eastern Europe was too keen on Russian domination. Sure it may have beaten German occupation, but I kind of think they would have preferred their freedom.  The US once JP was out of the way, could field as much equipment, troops, and nuclear deterrent that it took to make Russia capitulate. Stalin wasn’t exactly loved so much as the Nazis were hated.

 



Yet, today, America's leaders are reenacting every folly that brought these great powers [Russia, Germany, and Japan] to ruin -- from arrogance and hubris, to assertions of global hegemony, to imperial overstretch, to trumpeting new 'crusades,' to handing out war guarantees to regions and countries where Americans have never fought before. We are piling up the kind of commitments that produced the greatest disasters of the twentieth century.
 — Pat Buchanan – A Republic, Not an Empire