By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Sales - PS3 has no game to counter Halo ODST this year...

DirtyP2002 said:
CMoney said:

METACRITIC PROVES YOU WRONG and you still won't accept it!!!!!!!!!

It doesn't matter which 1 has been out longer - XBOX 360 STILL HAS MORE QUALITY and QUANTITY of games than ps3.

Did people say.....ps2 has been out longer so it has more quality and quantity than original xBoX??? NO!!!

They bought the system with the most and best games.

People DO NOT care which system came out first.

XBOX is less expensive , has more games, and has higher quality games than ps3.

GAME OVER

 

 Don't argue with them. You are right, but they do not care. I don't care how old a game is, if it is good, I will pick it up. I am playing Warcraft 3 daily. Is it old? Yes. Is it a good games? YES!

Fact: At this point the Xbox360 offers a brider game library than the PS3. This is no flaming or anything, the PS3 has great games as well, the Xbox360 just got more.

Just because the 360 has Madden 2006 and CoD2, that means it has a broader range? Sure, speaking absolutely, but not relatively. When you say "OMG the 360 has 137 GAMEZ!! PS3 DOESNT!!!" it's THOSE games that boosts the numbers. Games that came out in 2005/early 2006 that NO ONE cares about anymore. And I wouldn't even say it has a broader range either...in those first two years, the games were mostly FPS/TPS. It wasn't called the "ShooterBox" for no reason

 



Around the Network
CMoney said:

@BMAKER - actually most of the xbox games did NOT suck.

It had a higher percentage of games rate 80 or above than the ps2.

http://www.mcvuk.com/news/33970/Sony-and-Microsoft-wage-Metacritic-war

Please do some research ..... you are only proving your ignorance.

Feels so good to be right, and know the truth, and not be blinded by the insanity of illogical fanboyism :)

Yeah...because it had what? 2-300 games total. PS3 had over 8000 (including games never released outside of Japan). It's like the latest study saying the PS3 attach ratio is higher than the Wii's.....but the Wii has 50 million units in consumer homes, so it's harder to maintain a high attach rate

 



I pray your joking, lol.



Kantor said:
DirtyP2002 said:
Squall_Leonhart said:
TBH Halo is getting a bit overused my MS these days! I mean do they really have no other option rather than to re-hash several different versions/add-ons to the Halo franchise??

I mean i would think it is better that Sony are focusing on making new IP's rather than making more and more of the same game!

Halo is good and all but even that has its limits!

 

The Xbox360 released November 2005. We are heading towards May 2009 and there are 2 Halo Games on the Xbox360, both from a totally different genre. Your point?

With two more announced.

But hey, four games isn't bad, looking at some series (like Tales, or Guitar Hero)

 

 

Eh what? Four?  Halo 3, Wars, ODST, and...?

 

Please, I would like to know what the 4th Halo for the 360 is? :D



                           

BMaker11 said:
CMoney said:

@BMAKER - actually most of the xbox games did NOT suck.

It had a higher percentage of games rate 80 or above than the ps2.

http://www.mcvuk.com/news/33970/Sony-and-Microsoft-wage-Metacritic-war

Please do some research ..... you are only proving your ignorance.

Feels so good to be right, and know the truth, and not be blinded by the insanity of illogical fanboyism :)

Yeah...because it had what? 2-300 games total. PS3 had over 8000 (including games never released outside of Japan). It's like the latest study saying the PS3 attach ratio is higher than the Wii's.....but the Wii has 50 million units in consumer homes, so it's harder to maintain a high attach rate

 

You just keep digging yourself deeper into a hole.  You didn't even read the article.

xbox had 219 above 80.

ps2 had 320 above 80.

So basically of those 8000 ps2 games, most were crappy shovelware (like the wii now days).

Wow, your reasoning is so damn pathetic....lmao!!!!!!!!

 



Around the Network
BMaker11 said:
DirtyP2002 said:
CMoney said:

METACRITIC PROVES YOU WRONG and you still won't accept it!!!!!!!!!

It doesn't matter which 1 has been out longer - XBOX 360 STILL HAS MORE QUALITY and QUANTITY of games than ps3.

Did people say.....ps2 has been out longer so it has more quality and quantity than original xBoX??? NO!!!

They bought the system with the most and best games.

People DO NOT care which system came out first.

XBOX is less expensive , has more games, and has higher quality games than ps3.

GAME OVER

 

 Don't argue with them. You are right, but they do not care. I don't care how old a game is, if it is good, I will pick it up. I am playing Warcraft 3 daily. Is it old? Yes. Is it a good games? YES!

Fact: At this point the Xbox360 offers a brider game library than the PS3. This is no flaming or anything, the PS3 has great games as well, the Xbox360 just got more.

Just because the 360 has Madden 2006 and CoD2, that means it has a broader range? Sure, speaking absolutely, but not relatively. When you say "OMG the 360 has 137 GAMEZ!! PS3 DOESNT!!!" it's THOSE games that boosts the numbers. Games that came out in 2005/early 2006 that NO ONE cares about anymore. And I wouldn't even say it has a broader range either...in those first two years, the games were mostly FPS/TPS. It wasn't called the "ShooterBox" for no reason

 

 

Here you say, we have to see things relatively.

Talking about PS2/Xbox you say, we have to see absolute numbers.



Imagine not having GamePass on your console...

CMoney said:
BMaker11 said:
CMoney said:

@BMAKER - actually most of the xbox games did NOT suck.

It had a higher percentage of games rate 80 or above than the ps2.

http://www.mcvuk.com/news/33970/Sony-and-Microsoft-wage-Metacritic-war

Please do some research ..... you are only proving your ignorance.

Feels so good to be right, and know the truth, and not be blinded by the insanity of illogical fanboyism :)

Yeah...because it had what? 2-300 games total. PS3 had over 8000 (including games never released outside of Japan). It's like the latest study saying the PS3 attach ratio is higher than the Wii's.....but the Wii has 50 million units in consumer homes, so it's harder to maintain a high attach rate

 

You just keep digging yourself deeper into a hole.  You didn't even read the article.

xbox had 219 above 80.

ps2 had 320 above 80.

So basically of those 8000 ps2 games, most were crappy shovelware (like the wii now days).

Wow, your reasoning is so damn pathetic....lmao!!!!!!!!

 

PS2* not PS3 over 8000. And I did read the article, but what relevancy does it have here?

Now talking about the PS2/Xbox...yeah, it has 219....but how many are shared with the PS2? Changes your perspective, doesn't it? On the other hand, the PS2 had more compelling reasons to pick up the console (Final Fantasy X, X-2, XII), Kingdom Hearts, Jak and Daxter, Ratchet, WWE Smackdown series, MGS, Guitar Hero (at the time), etc. So what hole am I digging myself into? And yes, it's kind of a poor showing to have 8000 games and only about 300 being quality, but UNLIKE the Wii, the PS2 is got high profile games all the time. Wii gets them like...once or twice a year.

Only reason I even brought up the PS2 having so many games was because you brought up tie ratios

 



CMoney said:
@bmaker - actually the xbox 360 has MORE QUALITY AND QUANTITY OF GAMES than ps3.

XBOX 360 HAS 137 games rated above 80 on metacritic.

PS3 ONLY HAS 93.

Your lose in both the quality AND quantity comparisson.

Sorry, but those are the facts :)

 

Not sure what the numbers would come to but what if you remove every single sports game dated before the 2009 titles for each platform. That would erase plenty of Soccer, Football, Baseball, etc... games from 2006 and 2005 right?

 



iPhone = Great gaming device. Don't agree? Who cares, because you're wrong.

Currently playing:

Final Fantasy VI (iOS), Final Fantasy: Record Keeper (iOS) & Dragon Quest V (iOS)     

    

Got a retro room? Post it here!

CMoney said:
BMaker11 said:
CMoney said:

@BMAKER - actually most of the xbox games did NOT suck.

It had a higher percentage of games rate 80 or above than the ps2.

http://www.mcvuk.com/news/33970/Sony-and-Microsoft-wage-Metacritic-war

Please do some research ..... you are only proving your ignorance.

Feels so good to be right, and know the truth, and not be blinded by the insanity of illogical fanboyism :)

Yeah...because it had what? 2-300 games total. PS3 had over 8000 (including games never released outside of Japan). It's like the latest study saying the PS3 attach ratio is higher than the Wii's.....but the Wii has 50 million units in consumer homes, so it's harder to maintain a high attach rate

 

You just keep digging yourself deeper into a hole.  You didn't even read the article.

xbox had 219 above 80.

ps2 had 320 above 80.

So basically of those 8000 ps2 games, most were crappy shovelware (like the wii now days).

Wow, your reasoning is so damn pathetic....lmao!!!!!!!!

 

Just thought you should know that the PS3 has 226 games that score UNDER 80 on Metacritic,  the 360 has a stunning 471 games that score UNDER 80.  So I guess its M$ that is putting out crappy shovelware as you put it.

BTW, Metacritic is a list of games that have at least 5 reviews, it is not a list of available games.

There is about a 150 more games for the 360 than the PS3 which most people could care less about.  Compare that to the PS2 that has 2000 more games than the xbox.  That is a huge difference there.

 



DirtyP2002 said:
BMaker11 said:
DirtyP2002 said:
CMoney said:

METACRITIC PROVES YOU WRONG and you still won't accept it!!!!!!!!!

It doesn't matter which 1 has been out longer - XBOX 360 STILL HAS MORE QUALITY and QUANTITY of games than ps3.

Did people say.....ps2 has been out longer so it has more quality and quantity than original xBoX??? NO!!!

They bought the system with the most and best games.

People DO NOT care which system came out first.

XBOX is less expensive , has more games, and has higher quality games than ps3.

GAME OVER

 

 Don't argue with them. You are right, but they do not care. I don't care how old a game is, if it is good, I will pick it up. I am playing Warcraft 3 daily. Is it old? Yes. Is it a good games? YES!

Fact: At this point the Xbox360 offers a brider game library than the PS3. This is no flaming or anything, the PS3 has great games as well, the Xbox360 just got more.

Just because the 360 has Madden 2006 and CoD2, that means it has a broader range? Sure, speaking absolutely, but not relatively. When you say "OMG the 360 has 137 GAMEZ!! PS3 DOESNT!!!" it's THOSE games that boosts the numbers. Games that came out in 2005/early 2006 that NO ONE cares about anymore. And I wouldn't even say it has a broader range either...in those first two years, the games were mostly FPS/TPS. It wasn't called the "ShooterBox" for no reason

 

 

Here you say, we have to see things relatively.

Talking about PS2/Xbox you say, we have to see absolute numbers.

Yes, as contradictory as it sounds, I think of it that way because no one talks about the PS2 having better games than the Xbox....because of Madden/NBA Live 2001. Compared to the Xbox, those games were exclusive to PS2, but they aren't counted as reasons why the PS2's library was better, which is why I don't think in relative terms here. Like I replied to CMoney, the PS2 was better because of the God of Wars, the Kingdom Hearts, the Final Fantasies, the Jak and Daxters, Ratchet and Clanks, Metal Gears, that made it great.

People here toss that 139 number for the 360 around....but the difference between it, and the PS3's 96 or so, is because of every 2006 level EA sports game, and stuff like Dead Rising