CMoney said:
BMaker11 said:
CMoney said:
@BMAKER - actually most of the xbox games did NOT suck.
It had a higher percentage of games rate 80 or above than the ps2.
http://www.mcvuk.com/news/33970/Sony-and-Microsoft-wage-Metacritic-war
Please do some research ..... you are only proving your ignorance.
Feels so good to be right, and know the truth, and not be blinded by the insanity of illogical fanboyism :)
|
Yeah...because it had what? 2-300 games total. PS3 had over 8000 (including games never released outside of Japan). It's like the latest study saying the PS3 attach ratio is higher than the Wii's.....but the Wii has 50 million units in consumer homes, so it's harder to maintain a high attach rate
|
You just keep digging yourself deeper into a hole. You didn't even read the article.
xbox had 219 above 80.
ps2 had 320 above 80.
So basically of those 8000 ps2 games, most were crappy shovelware (like the wii now days).
Wow, your reasoning is so damn pathetic....lmao!!!!!!!!
|
PS2* not PS3 over 8000. And I did read the article, but what relevancy does it have here?
Now talking about the PS2/Xbox...yeah, it has 219....but how many are shared with the PS2? Changes your perspective, doesn't it? On the other hand, the PS2 had more compelling reasons to pick up the console (Final Fantasy X, X-2, XII), Kingdom Hearts, Jak and Daxter, Ratchet, WWE Smackdown series, MGS, Guitar Hero (at the time), etc. So what hole am I digging myself into? And yes, it's kind of a poor showing to have 8000 games and only about 300 being quality, but UNLIKE the Wii, the PS2 is got high profile games all the time. Wii gets them like...once or twice a year.
Only reason I even brought up the PS2 having so many games was because you brought up tie ratios