reverie said: sqrl, re 9 million - The article you link to said that UBS extimated 9 million Wiis shipped until the end of 2006. So your source is an analyst's forecast? I thought we agreed here long time ago that analysts are not particularly insightful. In addition, that article you link to said "9 million, up from 6 million, the official Nintendo forecast". Nintendo had that 6 million forecast for fiscal 2007 (April 2006 to March 2007) not calender 2006, so UBS is probably referring to that timespan and the article's editor seems not to realize this.
There was one real (not conjured up by analysts) delay, with Nintendo shipping only 3.2 million instead of 4 million units in 2006. I believe these 800k units were depleted in very early 2007.
re Q4 sales - You do remember there is a difference between sold-to-retail and sold-to-consumers, right? I ask this for 2 reasons.
1. European retailers are stocked with Wiis right now. That accounts for 300k or 400k or more. Sold-to-retail is above 12 million now.
2. Japanese and American retailers are still waiting for their shelve units. Those could make 500k or 750k of the Q4 sales.
Both of these are one-time effects, because naturally I'm not suggesting that retailers actually consume Wiis. But sold-to-retail for any console should at least be 1 million units ahead of sold-to-consumers. That is pent-up demand Nintendo is still carrying around and probably won't satisfy this year, so why not satisfy it in Q1? Retailers need shelve units even at a slow season.
Above that, you do remember that the Wii is held back not by demand, but by supply? You cannot estimate Q4 by looking at Q1, Q2 or Q3 sales. I'd wager the Wii has now a demand of 4 million units per quarter and 6 million for the Holiday quarter.
The numbers I gave for Q2, Q3 and Q4 were not my prediction, just an example. As I said I am waiting for Nintendo's fiscal reports in October and January. Only they can hold proof to me one way or the other. And if you are still on vgchartz by that time I'd like to discuss this subject again in light of the new facts. |
While I agree that analysts aren't exactly the most accurate (especially as of late), how far off are we to believe they are with this prediction? If he was off by 20% it could be as low as 7.2m, but even at that number they almost certainly would have to be stockpiling by now.
As far as the difference between shipped and sold, please take a look at my signature. Back when sony changed the way they did their financial reporting, I was the one who came up with the idea to make a picture to explain it to people. The current incarnation of that graphic in my sig is due to the talents of "Your Mother" (thats his screen name, I'm not insulting you lol). So yes I am very aware of this difference.
I will follow along with your numbering system for ease of understanding:
1) Ok if we want to say this is the case that is fine, but as you point out the pipeline that exists as the units transitition down the supply chain has been there since the beginning. And the units are moving through it not being consumed by it.
Because of how quickly the Wii is selling (even in places where it does stay in stock for a full week), each shipment is refilling the pipeline and there is a constant movement down the chain which for our accounting purposes has very little bearing on the final numbers shipped for a given period. To put it simply, they need to ship enough to replace what is being sold in a given period, this isn't always true in every situation, but for the Wii it is true right now.
2) I'm not entirely sure what you are saying here, to be honest, perhaps you could elaborate a bit. Specifically on what you are referring to in the second sentence when you say "Those". I am pretty sure you are trying to convey some sort of supply chain mechanism but your wording is a bit vague to me. Little more info on what you're referring to please.
On my estimates of Q1-4 using the simple formula. Actually thats not meant to be taken as an in-depth analysis. I think we if take a look at Nintendo's past reports we find that they like to be cautious with their numbers. The reason I bring this up is because while I think the effect you are eluding to (ie increased production) will be in play over the holidays and beyond but I don't think its going to jumpstart itself all of a sudden in the last portion of this quarter.
The very point that you make that the Wii is supply constrained and not demand constrained is why we should have seen signs of increases on the levels you are implying in our numbers for this quarter already. There is signs of increase, but not enough to make me think Sept is going to explode into that many extra units. Currently given the 5 week period of Sept I think it is likely the Wii will hit the 1.3m mark for the month and 3.5m shipped for the quarter pretty closely. With the possibility of supply increases towards the end of Sept I think its effects will be felt a bit to late for the Q2 financial report and definitely too late for the sellthrough numbers tracked on this site.
But moving into Q3 we should see this trend pick up I agree, and I think production increases can account for (at the high end) the 800k increase from 3.5m(Q2) to 4.3m(Q3). But I do not believe that when the phrase "substantially more than the launch, substantially more than has been seen to date" is used by the conservative NIntendo that 4.3m units for the entirety of Q3 fits that at all, nor do I think production will be up enough to sustain the kind of post X-mas numbers there needs to be for them meet a model like the one you provided and meet their predicted goals from Q1.
Actually in light of these new numbers I won't be surprised if there is another raising of the estimates with the next report. Would that surprise you if they did raise estimates again?
Ultimately, I think we could see 4m in December alone this year (on the high side), and going with that high end number I think we could see as much as 7m in Q3 (Oct-1.2m, Nov- 1.8m, Dec-4m). But I think the likely scenario is something like 6m for Q3 (Oct-1.2m, Nov-1.6m, Dec-3.4m).
Just curious but what do you think the Q3 monthly breakdown will look like? The reason I ask is because I am trying to figure out how your belief that there is no stockpiling is reconciled against this unprecedented statement which directly refers to launch and thus the 2.5m in Dec number. Do you think production will be up that much to meet that kind of demand without stockpiling? I guess I am trying to figure out how this puzzle comes together from your viewpoint, and since I am not at your viewpoint I am having a hard time with it.