| Squilliam said: But, but the PS3 is a better copy of the failure that was the Xbox 1. They failed even better than Microsoft did 1st time around. (Did I make enough of a dirty remark for Xbox fans to be satisfied?) |
You are hilarious man.
| Squilliam said: But, but the PS3 is a better copy of the failure that was the Xbox 1. They failed even better than Microsoft did 1st time around. (Did I make enough of a dirty remark for Xbox fans to be satisfied?) |
You are hilarious man.
| Jeronimo66 said: I don't think he is being naive I think he is just speaking his mind, I disagree with him on the higher quality games part (as graphics alone does not make a higher quality game) and that if the ps3 drops in price 360 will never outsell them again. |
the thing is, sony titles tend to be at least good in everthing else also >_o.
just look their average metacritic and gamerankings.
sony fails in 3 things.. it was late by one year, 360 titles show more legs, and they don't know how to market it game.
microsoft made an epic trailer for a xBLA game like bloqbuster movie.
ps3 price.
though there is hope GT5 sell itself, cars company actually advertise it, so its hard to sony to screw that up and a 299$ price point by the time it's released.
and that year start will mean nothing when the generation its over... actually it showing already, third party exclusives are almost non existant.
actually all main games are multiplatform now.
well sony has lost a lot of money o the ps3 - so actually - sony copied microsoft
sony has NEVER made 1 penny of profit on the ps3.
Also, sony copied ACHIEVEMENTS from xbox sooooo....thread FAIL
Stop insulting the 360. Sony have copied Microsoft just as much as Microsoft have copied Sony, and they both copy the hell out of Nintendo.
Sure, I find it annoying that they steal exclusives and have them delayed, but it's their job.
yeah um sony came into this and they did what? bought a whole lot of thing to get competition between nintendo and sega. Sony is usually considered smart for this, yet when ms does the same thing they are considered greedy. MS came into the market to take on Sony, they saw sony had a very strategic plan.
It was parallel to MS's current plight trying to put a stake between the two major players, it was sega and nintendo and now it is sony and nintendo.
Sony now doesnt have to do this, which congrats to them, they have made it, but ms technically still havent, the amount of things i read and the thought of the back of my mind that sony is going to come like a hurricane, shows why sony is where it is. Next Gen we may see Ms doing something else, and if per se apple came into it they would have to do the same thing as every other new console does, buy some companies and excl for games.
What will they be seen as in that case, smart or greedy?
| Kantor said: Stop insulting the 360. Sony have copied Microsoft just as much as Microsoft have copied Sony, and they both copy the hell out of Nintendo. Sure, I find it annoying that they steal exclusives and have them delayed, but it's their job. |
When did sony copy microsoft?
except for trophies other than that, what?
phinch1 said:
When did sony copy microsoft? |
Lol, I'm defending Microsoft. Weird.
Anyway, trophies were an obvious copy of achievements.
PSN copies XBL to improve, regularly.
Resistance 2 is a copy of Halo (It's more like Halo than it is Resistance Fall of Man!)
But of course, the reverse happens.
Microsoft copied Sony for the new controller
Avatars were a copy of Home avatars (and Miis)
I'm pretty sure Ninja Gaiden was intended to be a Devil May Cry clone.
And more, for both sides.
Ninja Gaiden is owned by Tecmo, not microsoft. I don't understand how hard it is for people to get that in their heads. Not to mention it was a series long before DMC