Your full of fail man

no a game always looks better on the console it's made on, unless they spend extensive time on the port. however the difference is not that big so they dont bother

@ mrstickball

The learning curve isn't that big, the bulk of low-level developers think the PS3 is easy to work with.

The developers who are dependent on high level 3rd party technology are of course dependent on the technology providers. That's why for example Epic got sued initially, alledging a lack of effort.

The general practices to take advantage of the SPUs aren't too different from what developers will have to learn anyhow with upcoming PC technology.

This... is crazy...

CGI-Quality said: puffy said: Killzone 2 was in development for 4 years to make it look that good, quite simply 3rd parties don't have that time and the 360 is easier to develop for so.. That's such a fanboyish statement.. So KZ2 was in development since Feb 2005?

 

Killzone 2 is a first-person shooter for the PlayStation 3, developed by Guerrilla Games and published by Sony Computer Entertainment Europe. It is the third installment in the Killzone franchise that began on the PlayStation 2 with Killzone and continued on the PlayStation Portable with Killzone: Liberation. The game was first announced at E3 2005, with a tech demo on display, while the first gameplay footage was shown two years later at E3 2007.^[7] Killzone 2 was released worldwide late February 2009. Killzone 2 was met with critical acclaim and has sold 1.41 million copies worldwide so far as quoted by Sony Computer Entertainment America, NPD Group, and Vgchartz.

 

No...it was in development before that..

Hey, for some titles microsoft couldve done so, but for all muli-plats, i dont think so, that would cost way too much.

Your having a laugh with this thread right?

Ok the J man is going to show you the difference between a stupid question and a question that should never be asked:

1.wtf is 786_ali? Did you just put irrelevent numbers and added your name to it?

2. "Playstation 3 is the future........NOW......B_E_L_I_E_V_E"? Wtf is that suppose to mean? How is it possible to be in the future.....now? Doesnt that make it the present and thus not the future?

3. Why does your OP have an even number of lines(4) when the contents of it are odd(stupid)?

 

There you have it ,the above were stupid questions. Yours were questions that should never be asked.

no no no