O well, I'll just enjoy all my extra games then, who would have thought it, a game console that you can play games on..... no problem here.
O well, I'll just enjoy all my extra games then, who would have thought it, a game console that you can play games on..... no problem here.
| CMoney said: Once again TORILLIAN is banning people who support xbox. The OBVIOUS BIAS of him and other moderators ruins the credibility of this site. I hope Brett can get these people under control. |
Hopefully he will ban you also.
OT: OMG Really? The 360 outselling the PS3? Woah... when did this happen?
Oh yeah, i remember... when the 360 became half the price of the PS3...
Numonex bugs me.
![]()
| Ajescent said: Metacritic=God confirmed? |
Yup. SONY uses it themselves and use it to measure quality
snyperdud said:
FACT - The 360 has been out a year longer to garner such games. |
FACT - Nobody gave a shit when PS2 was released earlier than Xbox and GC and do buyers care??? Its Sonys fault not MS
There you have it folks, Metacritic= God and the fact that the 360 costs more than the ps3 has no relevence on the gap between the two of them...in other news I'm getting tired of seeing the same old arguements on here.
I was hoping this place would have less fanboys on either side than Gamefaqs but it seems that's not the case, so I'm starting to fall out of love with this place.
Thread title should be "how the hell is PS3 almost keeping up with 360 at twice the price?"
hmm pretty uninformed start. Because of it didn't even read the full post until finished this post of mine and edited this sentence back in. heck i don't own a single game for ps3 or 360 but i can name more than 3 huge games on the 360 super quick
halo 3
gears of war 1 & 2
Mass Effect
Fable 2
Star Ocean 4
and those are just the games i have played (- gears 2) and there are also some mutlplat that were thought to be exclusive at one point and pretty much sold like exclusive such as bioshock.
I'm sure there are people that can list a lot more big exclusives they have, or had that are later multi.
dude for this article i can state only one thing
''Americans are saving 360-(pivotal role) whereas Japanese are saving ps3 (minimal role) but huge in comparison to 360's ratio.
360 will continue the iterations for the same exclusives...hoping them best.

| Ajescent said: There you have it folks, Metacritic= God and the fact that the 360 costs more than the ps3 has no relevence on the gap between the two of them...in other news I'm getting tired of seeing the same old arguements on here. I was hoping this place would have less fanboys on either side than Gamefaqs but it seems that's not the case, so I'm starting to fall out of love with this place. |
The price argument gets old too. Sony released the console thinking they can get bluray buyers and gamers to buy it so it will outsell the 360. Clearly that hasn't happened. Plus Sony uses metacritic in their press releases so I dont know why ur getting upset. Sony acknowledges the 360 has a bigger quantity of better games. You should too
| perpride said: Thread title should be "how the hell is PS3 almost keeping up with 360 at twice the price?" |
Then it should also read:
"how is the PS3 losing by 30k per week to a console that sells most commonly at $300/$400, even with the more, "better" exclusives on PS3?"
Since about 45% of the 360's sales are arcade models. The other 55% is Pro/Elite at $300/$400. Could be closer to 50/50 now, but regardless, half of those sales are not the cheap $200 price point, so PS3 lovers can not ignore the higher priced SKU sales and think that it is always a $200 gap.