I understand where you are coming from, but the game will be fine, don't believe all this stuff about them downgrading the game because of the 360, the game looks cinematic and is the most beautiful game I have ever seen the thing looks like a dream, but you are playing it.

Dont take this the wrong way but the reason why most 360 owners(making the assumption because you have a singular gamertag in ur sig) don't want to believe that SE has screwed the PS3 version of this game in some way shape or form(as noted before) is because the fact that they brought it to 360 means that you get to play it without owning a PS3. Its the greatest thing in the world for a fan of the series who didnt want to have to get a PS3 for it. Yet for those of us who own a PS3 and were looking forward to it, we can see where it is effecting our version of the game in many ways.

I am not bashing the fact that it is MP, but the fact that 360 is affecting my PS3 version, plain and simple. All MP titles have an effect on their respecting platforms, which is the reason they will always be inferior to an exclusive game.

If demo hits PSN I bet we will have to pay something like 5-10$ for it.

First off, don't come and question me then say something inaccurate.

Second. PS3 is a blu-ray player, and it is a higher end BD player. In fact it was praised as the best when it came out, for being cheap and allowing for future expansion with firmware upgrades. Older BD players did not have BD live so can not be updated to newer firmware, thus they may never be able to read BD discs of higher layers then what they allowed when made.

Third, layers on a BD disc and DVD disc are much different. A DVD disc, everytime a layer is added, the speed drops considerably. A dual layer DVD disc reads at 1.1 MB/s, while a single layer disc reads at 1.6 MB/s. Why is it you don't see triple layer and more on DVD? Speeds are under standards. BD is a straight on read, higher intensity, and way the layers are stacked, only loses a small amount of read speed per layer. 4.5 MB/s(1x) for a single layer, and 4.48MB/s for a dual layer. By the time it's 32 layers you would still have a theoritical read rate of 3.80MB/s.

Fourth, Pioneer engineered a 16 layer disc, and stated 32 layers would be able to be read on any current BD player with BD live or ability to update firmware.

Stating it's possible and actually doing it are an entirely different thing. Pioneer has specifically stated that only 16-layer has been done; therefore, only 16-layer is confirmed.

Other than that, you just spouted a bunch of facts that have nothing to do with the discussion at hand, so I'm not really sure what to say about the rest.

This.

First, you're not forced to fill your Blu-Ray at full capacity and second :

Apparently, the demo is not even on the same disc as the movie. This rumor fails.

Believe it or not 360 is not causing games on ps3 to be downgraded.

This can't be true. There's not that many art assets in the demo, which means that the majority of those 5GBs would be just the game engine.

If this were the case, a 360 version would actually be impossible. Each disc would need the engine on, leaving only ~2GBs for each segment the actual game. The 360 version would need like 30+ discs if this were true, and you'd be swapping to the next one every hour or two.

As this clearly won't be the case, I'm calling BS on this story.

the game is really not that big. Developers put duplicate data on the blu ray to make up for its crappy transfer rate.

The 360 wont need this hence smaller game size.