outlawauron said:
Because God of War isn't a big seller. |
Bigger brand than Killzone was haha. I think it should have quite an easy chance to outsell KZ2. Maybe not as easy on PS2 but still. It's got quite large brand appeal.
outlawauron said:
Because God of War isn't a big seller. |
Bigger brand than Killzone was haha. I think it should have quite an easy chance to outsell KZ2. Maybe not as easy on PS2 but still. It's got quite large brand appeal.
Man PS3 is looking good. GOW series was a late bloomer on the PS2 but it was amazing.
Can't wait for GOW 3!!!!!!!
Fact: Earthbound is the greatest game ever made
| HanzoTheRazor said: ^ U call bullshit? So many people have no idea, even when all the cards are layed out on the table for them! It is Santa Monica and a SONY 1st party developed game, 'nuff said. |
As I see it, the only game surpassing KZ2's extremely high graphics bar will be Uncharted 2.
The Ps3 is finally showing its true colors Go SONY!!!
*Al Bundy's My Hero*


*Al Bundy For President*
Waiting On GT7!!!
PSN ID: Acidfacekiller
GOW3 to surpass KZ2? of course... GOW franchise have more fanbase than that of KZ
PLAYSTATION®2 is the yesterday.....NOW.......still......A_L_I_V_E
Consoles own:
Nintendo: Famicom(japanese NES, Family Computer), GBC, GBA, DS, Wii
Sony: PS1, PS2, PSP, PS3
Microsoft: future 360 owner
I respect that it's possible to look better than KZ2. But why do devs talk about X game being Y% better than a demo? It ruins all credability for me. Even Naughty Dogs devs said developers who talk in percentages are talking from their arse.
Also Sony should just keep their head down. They may look silly at E3 this year if GOW 3 isnt the best looking Console game. Not only is Uncharted 2 in development but we all know M$ have splashed out for this years E3. They have to be planning something big, as well as stating they had first party titles beyond KZ2's graphics.
I just think Sony should keep their head down and just let games do the talking.
| selnor said: I respect that it's possible to look better than KZ2. But why do devs talk about X game being Y% better than a demo? It ruins all credability for me. Even Naughty Dogs devs said developers who talk in percentages are talking from their arse. Also Sony should just keep their head down. They may look silly at E3 this year if GOW 3 isnt the best looking Console game. Not only is Uncharted 2 in development but we all know M$ have splashed out for this years E3. They have to be planning something big, as well as stating they had first party titles beyond KZ2's graphics. I just think Sony should keep their head down and just let games do the talking. |
actually none of the developers of GOW have ever talked about being better than other games or used percentages this is all OPM and some blog
but I wouldn't be surprised if GOW III is better than KZ2 in graphics after all when GOW III is released (march 2010) it will be a full year after KZ2 and the Santa Monica studio is one of the best out there
| saimcheeda said: http://www.thegameraccess.com/2009/04/official-god-of-war-3-to-surpass-killzone-2/ PlayStation 3 has certainly kicked it up to high gear in the graphics department this year. First party titles have torn the eyes out of gamer’s sockets and fed them back in high definition glory. Just as soon Sony’s Killzone 2 had begun to set a new high water benchmark for console graphics, the gurus over at the Official PlayStation Magazine announced that Sony’s killer exclusive; God of War III, will be technically “leaps and bounds beyond anything the PS3 has seen to date.” If that wasn’t enough to tent the dungarees of Sony Fanboys across the world, we can add this juicy statement to a long line of exclamations extolling the virtues of Kratos’ third and final entry into the award-winning franchise. Sony Computer Entertainment has previously announced that God of War 3 will use a custom game engine that delivers four times the texture resolution of its predecessor. Industry veteran David Jaffe put his huge walrus balls on the line, exclaiming that God of War III looks 25%-30% better than the HD trailer, stating: “It happened to blow me away and remains the best looking console game I’ve ever seen.” God of War III, unlike Killzone 2, has a much better lineage than Sony’s FPS. Sony however, delivered in spades and gave PS3 owners a title that not only lived up to the hype that surrounded it, but surpassed it. With a 120-page script, God of War III will run at full 1080p HD resolution, and the game will support Sixaxis tilt and vibration functions. It seems when it comes to graphics front in the console war, the PS3’s vengeance is everything. |
Sorry to be a bit of a Buzz Killington (I do actually love the God of War series, it's the reason I bought a PS3 and my current most anticipated game), but:
1) It's not locked at 60 fps. It will run there most of the time, but I expect the framerate to be similar to CoD4 (dropping into the low 50s when lots is happening). But that's fine, because 50 fps is more than the maximum that Killzone 2 got to.
2) There is no Sixaxis tilt. Stig Asmussen said that he felt it wasn't necessary for the game, or something.
Having said that, God of War III will be awesome.
EDIT: It's worth mentioning that God of War II was leaps and bounds in front of anything else on the system graphically. It made Shadow of The Colossus look pretty tacky by comparison, and SoTC's graphics were awesome, back in 2005.
DiplomaticImmunity said:
dont start hyping up games then be dissapointed like the LBP hypes |
i didnt mean 4 million 1st month i meant lifetime!!