By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Sony - Solid proof the PS3 is a better system

Bitmap Frogs on 26 April 2009
Dgc1808 said:
The OP has done nothing but bring more negativity to the PS3 fan base...

Of course... any post would do that... he just made a bigger splash than the usual divers...

 

No. 

You are right however about the OP, he isn't making a good impression of ps3 owners.





Current-gen game collection uploaded on the profile, full of win and good games; also most of my PC games. Lucasfilm Games/LucasArts 1982-2008 (Requiescat In Pace).

Around the Network
Carl on 26 April 2009

I avoided this thread for as long as possible...

And what a flame/troll filled prodigy of hate and loathing it turned out to be.

Oh how i love VGChartz.



                            

Batman...WTF? on 26 April 2009
Ascended_Saiyan3 said:
S.T.A.G.E. said:
Ascended_Saiyan3 said:
CGI-Quality said:
S.T.A.G.E. said:
You cannot prove a system is better because of specs. It's by the games it acquires and how the system deals with those games.

Now this here is the truth people!

 

And, the PS3 is continuing to get expand in damn near ALL gaming areas (animations, A.I., DSP audio effects, characters of screen, resolution, gameplay options, details, lighting, textures, etc, plus continuous expansion in console features), should be more and more evidence towards which system is better.  These things add up to be more than a 2x difference.

Specs are not the end all be all for deciding the better APPLICATION of system power.  However, there is no denying that gaming hardware can NOT exist without specs.  Specs are designed to reach a certain set of design goals.  If you planned and executed well, the resulting specs WILL yield what they are suppose to.

The things that make the PS3 technically surpass the X360 in real world games are proper SPECS to overcome a specific set of streaming issues (like gaming, video, and much more).  Of course, if there wasn't a manufacturing hiccup in the process, the PS3 would have 8 cores available to developers instead of 7 cores.

 

 

 

I've never seen PS3 fanboys salivate more over graphics and hardware. During the PS2 and PSX era they defended their systems based on the quaity of games. Graphics would've been left up to the Xbox fanboys or something, but some people just make themselves into hypocrites, because of the on-going trend.

I don't know why you replied to my post is such a manner.  I've NEVER owned a Playstation before the PS3.  However, I did own 2 Xboxes (1 now).  In other words, maybe you show try to come up with another excuse, because this one fails.

 

So you're a graphics whore. One of the types that don't care about quality of the game in most cases. But at least you aren't a hypocrite.



PLEASE CLICK http://ihatejade.com/?id=s9uc4111iiip9rpjsyteq4kagmo3t5

 

S.T.A.G.E. on 26 April 2009
Ascended_Saiyan3 said:
S.T.A.G.E. said:
Ascended_Saiyan3 said:
CGI-Quality said:
S.T.A.G.E. said:
You cannot prove a system is better because of specs. It's by the games it acquires and how the system deals with those games.

Now this here is the truth people!

 

And, the PS3 is continuing to get expand in damn near ALL gaming areas (animations, A.I., DSP audio effects, characters of screen, resolution, gameplay options, details, lighting, textures, etc, plus continuous expansion in console features), should be more and more evidence towards which system is better.  These things add up to be more than a 2x difference.

Specs are not the end all be all for deciding the better APPLICATION of system power.  However, there is no denying that gaming hardware can NOT exist without specs.  Specs are designed to reach a certain set of design goals.  If you planned and executed well, the resulting specs WILL yield what they are suppose to.

The things that make the PS3 technically surpass the X360 in real world games are proper SPECS to overcome a specific set of streaming issues (like gaming, video, and much more).  Of course, if there wasn't a manufacturing hiccup in the process, the PS3 would have 8 cores available to developers instead of 7 cores.

 

 

 

I've never seen PS3 fanboys salivate more over graphics and hardware. During the PS2 and PSX era they defended their systems based on the quaity of games. Graphics would've been left up to the Xbox fanboys or something, but some people just make themselves into hypocrites, because of the on-going trend.

I don't know why you replied to my post is such a manner.  I've NEVER owned a Playstation before the PS3.  However, I did own 2 Xboxes (1 now).  In other words, maybe you show try to come up with another excuse, because this one fails.

 

 

 

I cannot call you a hypocrite, since you owned an Xbox last gen. But specs without the games leaves a system as an empty shell. Everyone who has half a brain knows that when games are no longer being made for a system, the life support is removed and the console is useless unless you like retro gaming.



XxXProphecyXxX on 26 April 2009

WOW....you guys really need to get off these forums arguing over such non-sense and actually spend more time playing your console....If only ppl would just play and enjoy their console of choice we wouldn't have such garbage arguments poping evry where.



Around the Network
uber on 26 April 2009

a lot of dismissive, poor thinkers on the boards here.


when i think of what defines the "best machine". i think one has to consider what defines the value. for me it is several things: price, functionality, quality, and games. back in the days of the nintendo/sega wars it was not a true battle...as i did not know anyone who had a sega (before the genesis). the sega may have been the better machine.

this war is different. the player has more choice than ever before. despite its gimmickyness, one would have to say the wii is the best system, as its price is very alluring, its functionality is unique, and its games are simple but stupid fun.


with respect to the ps3 and 360, i would have to give the edge in functionality, quality, and games to the ps3. it does way more, it does it better (which games are finally beginning to show), and it is way more reliable. price clearly goes to the 360, but that is inevitable.


and what cracks me up about this whole thing, the writing was all on the wall at jump that sony was in this for the long haul and would surpass the potential of the 360. now what we see is the frustration of its fans due to the fact that price cuts are the only thing keeping it competitive.

ps3 fans have had to eat humble pie for almost three years, and people wonder why we bring this up so much. get your forks ready xbots...dinner is almost served.



art is the excrement of culture