By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Microsoft - Ex-Bungie Dev, Christian Allen, Confirms Killzone 2 Can Be Done On Xbox360

Aj_habfan on 02 April 2009

This is one of the funnier April Fool's jokes I've heard this year.



Around the Network
Xen on 02 April 2009

^It's not a joke.



Phrancheyez on 02 April 2009

You think I believe some idiot who says it can be done on 360 when his best comeback is 'just like Halo 3 could be done on PS3'....was that ever a question? Was there ever any grey area there? I dunno..maybe Halo 3 is too powerful for the PS3!.......

Give me a break..this guy has no clue what he's talking about..



dbot on 02 April 2009
mrstickball said:
Throw $40 million dollars and 4 years at a X360 game, and I'm sure it'd look that good.

Too Human took 10 years and 60 + million.  Does it look this good?

 



Thanks for the input, Jeff.

 

 

yo_john117 on 02 April 2009
Branko2166 said:
Sardauk said:

Bring Killzone 2 on the 360 then

Better controllers, better online capabilities, better chat and more players !

 

you mean less players right?

I mean halo 3 can't even do 32 players,  and that's an exclusive game on the 360 with the supposedly superiror online, just throughing it out there.

I think i remember reading something somewhere on bungie.net a while back (before halo 3 came out) stating that the reason why they didn't make it more than 16 players is because it got to chaotic in matchmaking, and that 16 players for halo 3 was the sweet spot...don't have a link so don't quote me on it.  I really believe that its up to the developers to make games that have more players in multiplayer.  So I don't think its actually the 360 itself, its just that the developers chose not to make it 32 or 64 people online ect.

 



Around the Network
Garnett on 02 April 2009
dbot said:
mrstickball said:
Throw $40 million dollars and 4 years at a X360 game, and I'm sure it'd look that good.

Too Human took 10 years and 60 + million.  Does it look this good?

 

And what 4 consoles?

 

The actual development of TH took around 2 years and about 10 million i believe.



*Remember when the world was supposed to end on May 21st, 2011? Well click here to see our short parody video of it [not]ending*

selnor on 02 April 2009
wholikeswood said:
Selnor, didn't you get stung before for posting PC screens of Risen?

 

 LOL. I was waiting for this. Is there any reason why we cant expect the 360 version of a game to be very very close to it's PC counterpart ( except for resolution )? The following screens show none at all. Risen will look damn close so stop nitpicking LOL.

PC Bioshock on highest settings.

360 Bioshock

As you can see your theory about posting PC screens is totally unfounded.


Staude on 02 April 2009
Garnett said:
Staude said:
Garnett said:
Staude said:
Garnett said:
Sardauk said:

Bring Killzone 2 on the 360 then

better controllers,better online, better chat and better mics

 

 

 

Yea I can see why you'd want that..  not.

 

Actually,i didnt mind KZ2,its just the 3 second delay and the mass hype which killed it for me.

 

what delay ? also the game delivered on all fronts and surpassed atleast my expectations.

Of course it did,i can see why.

 

If you bought the game on the first day in the states you would of seen it had a horrible delay when turning,also the fact it takes a hole clip to kill someone,but i like the engine,i think all future FPS should be built like that.

 

 

 I bought it first day in europe which was two days before first day in america. Controls were fine. I'd rather they hadn't changed them.



Check out my game about moles ^

Garnett on 02 April 2009
Staude said:
Garnett said:
Staude said:
Garnett said:
Staude said:
Garnett said:
Sardauk said:

Bring Killzone 2 on the 360 then

better controllers,better online, better chat and better mics

 

 

 

Yea I can see why you'd want that..  not.

 

Actually,i didnt mind KZ2,its just the 3 second delay and the mass hype which killed it for me.

 

what delay ? also the game delivered on all fronts and surpassed atleast my expectations.

Of course it did,i can see why.

 

If you bought the game on the first day in the states you would of seen it had a horrible delay when turning,also the fact it takes a hole clip to kill someone,but i like the engine,i think all future FPS should be built like that.

 

 

 I bought it first day in europe which was two days before first day in america. Controls were fine. I'd rather they hadn't changed them.

Not the controls the control DELAY,which killed it and half a clip thing,other than that its a good game.



*Remember when the world was supposed to end on May 21st, 2011? Well click here to see our short parody video of it [not]ending*

NNN2004 on 02 April 2009
SpartanFX said:
NNN2004 said:
SpartanFX said:
NNN2004 said:
Staude said:
selnor said:
^ The thing that springs to mind is that the 360 hasnt got any games from good developers that have gone for realistic graphics.

Big games like Halo 3, Gears 2, Mass Effect all went for art direction. KZ2 currently wins at the moment, but I bet my bottom dollar the 360 will have a couple of games that beat it's graphics this year. Mainly Alan Wake and Forza 3. Also I believe Risen will to.

Personally KZ2 is the ONLY game on PS3 that is better than 360 games. Gears 2 for me was and still has the best wow moment ever for graphics.

Mass Effect 2 will undoubtly look astonishing also. CRYEngine 3 games for 360 will also beat KZ2. But then PS3 will continue to improve as well. By the end of the gen both consoles will not outshine the other.

Like i said before. Cryengine has some good things and some bad things about it. Particular particle effects and Lightning. I don't believe what they've shown us so far outranks killzone 2.

 

Models and textures beat the hell out of it though..

 

Personally i've had the most wow moments in Uncharted and Metal Gear Solid 4. I'm not saying that as a "sony fan" response but that's how it is for me. For instance, there is no game with such an advanced animation system as uncharted.. and it has these beautiful visuals throughout with No loads in the game at all! Some of the best games ever have been released this gen and it only looks like it's getting better.

The thing the unreal engine excels at is mapping. The models aren't very advanced but because of bumps, specular, normals etc.. they manage to make some pretty impressive stuff..

Personally I'm not all for unreal engine games because they tend to have a look that crosses over. I don't mind them, but they don't really give me as much satisfaction visually as some propriatory engines. That's just me though. I can see how other people would think differently.

 

But really where the difference lies in the ps3 and the 360, is a place where you'll only minimally be able to tell visually. I do find it impressive that sony has managed to overtake the 360 visually even though it was launched much later, but if you look at the specs, the differences in games will be things such as physics, lightning,  AI.. stuff like that. Mostly things that the processor does.

 

 

killzone 2 have a good effects but dont forget that its have a low textures also.

 

 

lol,,,no it doesn't

this is an old photo to hype the game but if you take a photo from the real game you will see the low textures clearly ... can you post a photo from your tv ?

 

 

lol,,the final game looks better than this.this was from the old preview built.

 

yes i can take a photo of the game from my TV.(i ll pm it to you tomorrow,casue i m goin to bed now)

if you cant post a photo from your TV now then am glad to help ;)