Native 640 not upscalled.

Look at CS. That's nice and slow. And while I don't particularly like it (Takes no skill to AWP from the corner), it still shows games can be slow. Also if you give everyone hit-scan weapons in a slow game, like CS, the game does take no skill and ends up being decided on who saw who first.

Okay well here's my foolproof response

360 - $199/$299/$399

PS3 - $399/$499

PC - $1000? Maybe more?

Your response is quite full of fail.

it matters how much performance you want. If your looking for Crysis on high, about $700 is all thats needed to spend.

the fact you can get a quad for for $130 is dirt cheap because you have to realize comparing consoles vs PC hardware isnt a really good comparison. Since console hardware never changes until the next generation you never have increasing performance and ever changing prices. PC prices and performance change every 6 months. Older parts get cheaper while newer take on their older counterpart's price.

Yes, it is slower, but in CS it is mainly about who sees who first, basically just like CoD games.  There is no dueling dance of jumping and shooting(ala Tribes, Halo 3, Quake 3, UT2004).  The weapons kill extremely quickly and it is incredibly easy to aim.  This does not change my previous points.

CS isnt the only slow game. Battlefield is a slllooowwww game. Wolfenstein is. Day of Defeat. Even Warsaw is a mix of fast and slow combat (characters move so damn fast that you will have to hunt for your opponent in an arena that is meant for 1v1).

@jagged - that is not how CS works. You can be the first to see your opponent and be the one who is dead in the end. Its all about accuracy. If you put 5 shots into his arm and he head shots you with his deagle, your dead.

You can build a PC that will outperform PS3 for under $500. Check my sig.  With a simple overclock you can play Crysis on high, smooth as silk.

I could probably build it for less than that, just pick a game, Oblivion, Fallout, CoD:5, whatever, and you can probably beat PS360's graphics for about $350.

BF Slow LOL? A real Slow game is ArmA,Project Reality ect.

No I agree with those points. And you jsut agreed that it's whoever sees first is dead. Which is generally the case with 2 equally matched people (that is, they can put the mouse over you the quickest). Halo has the grenades to add a bit of depth and the regening shield (which is so wrong in a multiplayer game that I can't even begin to express how retarded the mechanic is). But yes, the skill of those faster games is lacking. It's far far harder to aim while the target AND yourself is moving so fast, with weapons which are not hitscan weps, than it is to move your reticule over the other person when both players have parkinson's disease (every consoel shooter).