TWRoO said:
The PS3 has no value to anyone who doesn't want to play it's games.... value has nothing to do with how much it costs to produce.
|
they don't make that much per unit, they wish they did though.

TWRoO said:
The PS3 has no value to anyone who doesn't want to play it's games.... value has nothing to do with how much it costs to produce.
|
they don't make that much per unit, they wish they did though.

Some people think it's overpriced, some don't.
The important part is that enough people still think it's not overpriced, as proved by its sales.
My Mario Kart Wii friend code: 2707-1866-0957
RolStoppable said:
That's your personal opinion and I don't mean that in a negative way. I'd just like to remind you that many people think differently. They might see no value in the features you listed, thus they don't care that the Wii doesn't have them. What most people see when purchasing a console are the games available for it. The Wii currently has the most desireable exclusive software and that's why people are willing to pay for it
|
Yeh, its my personnal opinion. Thx for understanding :). But I know that most people have different ways of purchasing/picking their consoles. i just wanted to point out different options and what I think is a better choice for them.
I love my Wii to death, but it is DEFINITELY overpriced.
3DS FC: 1306 6473 7511
Nintendod Network ID: xsorenx
Add me for Pokemon, New Leaf, and Fire Emblem, Mario Kart 8.
I would be very keen to know how much the Wii actually costs to make . I read an article a while ago which stated that although the Wii wasn't very powerful, the extremely low power consumption and efficiency of the parts meant that they weren't that cheap to produce. i.e. it wasn't as simple as pricing Gamecube parts today and multiplying by two. Certainly, that may just have been PR spin but nonetheless it makes me curious.
Yeah, the author really kinda answered his/her own question.
Procrastinato said:
I think of "slowing" as a derivative of growth of the industry. Does that make my viewpoint clearer? Last Year the Wii had momentum, in terms of marketshare, that looked as though it would eventually reach near %60. Now it looks like it will never hit 50%, because its competition has increased at a larger pace, with regards to week-to-week marketshare. @TWRoO: The "PS3 has no value if you don't want to play its games" comment above makes no sense... Did you mean the Wii, which doesn't function as a DVD player, CD player, etc, let alone a BD player?
|
Good point.... but to most people the games are the main reason, espcecially considering you can buy a smaller, cheaper blu-ray player now than the PS3.... or if you don't want blu-ray yet then DVD and CD players are dirt-cheap.

| Hyperion said: I love my Wii to death, but it is DEFINITELY overpriced. |
How much did you pay for it? And if it's the regular price, why did you pay more than you think it was worth?
A game I'm developing with some friends:
www.xnagg.com/zombieasteroids/publish.htm
It is largely a technical exercise but feedback is appreciated.
noname2200 said:
Here's the problem in your worldview. Perhaps you're just substituting your own preferences (that's fine), or you're only looking at this from a tech-sheet perspective (that seems to be the case), but "value" includes much more than just a list of features/price. For starters, recall that most of us buy game consoles to play games, and the Wii has tons of games that its competitors don't. This changes its value radically, especially for the "broad audience" that you spoke of (who demonstrably have little interest in the HD consoles' offering). To put it in perspective (and use a HIGHLY incomplete car analogy), the finest sports car in the world ain't worth jack if you need a really reliable pickup truck. Put alternatively, most people see a console's primary value in its games, rather than its bells and whistles, and the Wii's games apparently appeal to them more.
|
Hmm...your right about that. I never really thought of placing games into the issue. But I guess having a "broader audience" would want a console with more options and games like Wii Sports or Party games that they can enjoy with their kids or family.
Lit09 said:
Yeh, its my personnal opinion. Thx for understanding :). But I know that most people have different ways of purchasing/picking their consoles. i just wanted to point out different options and what I think is a better choice for them. |
Well, I'm a PC gamer too, as far as multimedia goes, HD consoles offer me obsolutely nothing, I buy consoles for games only, and once you get used to the Wiimote, the dual analog seems a little meh, I'll give you really stupid reasons as to why I say that too, if you are playing a game without motion sensing on the nun-chuck, you can keep playing comfortably with wiimote arm down while scratching your head with the nun-chuck hand without disrupting game play. also if I'm laying on my couch, I can spread my arms out in a very relaxing way while I play instead of having to hold my hands together. I really like that controller lol.

| TWRoO said: Clearly it isn't. Price is not the sum of it's components... I have said this before. The price should be put at whatever point customers are willing to pay for. So the Wii is priced perfectly. The DS is somewhere between N64 and Dreamcast graphically, should it be priced at $20? The PSP is about as powerful as a PS2, should it have a price cut? The PS2 is less powerful than the GameCube and Xbox were.... so why was it's price higher? |
Nice one TWRoO
I have very little to say, as I stopped reading when the author tried to claim that the xbox is more powerful than the Wii