By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - CryEngine3 Trailer Released

SpartanFX on 23 March 2009
point x said:
cool, I dont need an nvidia gforce blah, bla, blah to play crysis in my xbo360..he he he ...

 

i know what i m affraid of?

 

that they show this and when the games come out they look like far cry 2.(farcry2 engine of PS3/X360 was insane but the game was a different story )



 

 

 

Around the Network
Zkuq on 23 March 2009
yanamaster said:
the video quality is a disaster, but despite that you can really see how impressive that engine is. Too bad that there ae no computers that could handle a game on that engine right now.

If it runs on consoles, it'll run on current PCs as well. The improvements don't seem that significant so I'm guessing they've put more emphasis on optimization than they did with CryEngine 2. That said, so far this looks more like CryEngine 2.5 than CryEngine 3 (well, that doesn't come as a surprise).



haxxiy on 23 March 2009

Yes it looks better than Crysis except for some shading/post-processing. Insane textures. I didn't expect it at all considering RAM issues on consoles (mainly PS3).

At 0:52 is just insane :o



 

 

 

 

 

monlosez on 23 March 2009

Pretty good if it is for console.



nitekrawler1285 on 23 March 2009

I hope people start using it if only to get rid of the plastic sheen that seems runs rampant in many unreal engine games.



Around the Network
vlad321 on 23 March 2009

Let me get this straight, 2 years down the road and all we get is.... this? Seriously? What a waste of human time and manpower. Epic went from UE2 to UE3 in 4 years yes, but the jump between 2 and 3 was huge. This? This is just wasted time.



Tag(thx fkusumot) - "Yet again I completely fail to see your point..."

HD vs Wii, PC vs HD: http://www.vgchartz.com/forum/thread.php?id=93374

Why Regenerating Health is a crap game mechanic: http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=3986420

gamrReview's broken review scores: http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=4170835

 

Barozi on 23 March 2009
vlad321 said:
Let me get this straight, 2 years down the road and all we get is.... this? Seriously? What a waste of human time and manpower. Epic went from UE2 to UE3 in 4 years yes, but the jump between 2 and 3 was huge. This? This is just wasted time.

Waisted time for you maybe. For Crytek this engine means MON€Y !!!!



SpartanFX on 23 March 2009

ok someone post a video of cryengine 2 release trailer to compare



 

 

 

Zkuq on 23 March 2009
vlad321 said:
Let me get this straight, 2 years down the road and all we get is.... this? Seriously? What a waste of human time and manpower. Epic went from UE2 to UE3 in 4 years yes, but the jump between 2 and 3 was huge. This? This is just wasted time.

Well, even if it's not very impressive compared to CE2, it doesn't mean it's not impressive compared to other engines. CryEngine 2 is still easily the most impressive engine on the market (CE3 isn't on the market yet), and its only drawback is its high system requirements. Anyway, right now hardware is the limiting factor; there isn't much room for improvement until devs learn the systems even better than now.



Feylic on 23 March 2009

I don't think this was ever meant to have the same graphical leap as cryengine 1 to 2, it's meant to be easier to develop for, so they can license it out like Epics engine.