Bitmap Frogs said:
noname2200 said: It's been said already, but I do enjoy how the entire article's premise is based on criteria in which the PS3 is better than the 360...while ignoring how the Wii is better than the PS3 on these exact same things.
Oh, and Baki? The first rule for getting yourself out of a hole is to quit digging. Just saying. |
Pretty much. The "article" is fanboy drivel. It neglects things like the costs of developing on ps3 are unsustainable with the budgets these guys work on, etc.
If any non-handheld console should be targetted, it's the wii, not the ps3.
|
Indeed. It is a good comedy piece. Why would publishers put their games on the ps3 when the dev costs are just as high as 360 ones and they can get similar sales on the amrket leader, wii. We have no evidence that it cannot shift software in japan, in fact it sells tons of software there. A cheap spinoff tales game there sold quite well and the only ps3 rpg we can really compare it to is a super hyped WKC. I think once all these wii rpgs that have been listed are released, they will compare well to ps3 rpgs of similar quality.
Wii will be the rpg king by the end of the gen and be leader at the start of the next. Iwata won't be an idiot and lose the marketshare like Nintendo did in the 64 era.
Now Playing: The Witcher (PC)
Consoles Owned: NES, SNES, N64, PS1, PS2, Wii, Xbox 360, Game Boy, DS