I'd talked with a hand full of people about noticable frame rate issues I'd noticed on the Playstation 3 version of RE5. I guess it's been noticed by others as well.
http://www.digitalfoundry.org/blog/?p=576
What do you think?
I'd talked with a hand full of people about noticable frame rate issues I'd noticed on the Playstation 3 version of RE5. I guess it's been noticed by others as well.
http://www.digitalfoundry.org/blog/?p=576
What do you think?
It doesn't seems that bad to me...
Evan Wells (Uncharted 2): I think the differences that you see between any two games has much more to do with the developer than whether it’s on the Xbox or PS3.
when you say you asked a hand full of people was that 360 owner as well?
as for the video there was no differents that i saw maybe because its youtube quilty
| KylieDog said: I haven't run into any framerate issues and I'm the sort of person who really notices them. |
thats good to hear
as long as it not as bad as NFS undercover im good and by those vids it looks like its not

Play Me
Even with the side by side comparisin I see no difference. But if there is then that is a very good port for the PS3 version. You know 360 was the lead console. I'm tired of this nitpicking BS. These guys are trying their hardest to make the PS3 version look gimped but they fail.
Digital Foundry: Where 0.3 fps does matter ...
0.3 fps ... really ? I've heard of pixel-, achievments- and trophy-wh*res ... and now framerate-b*tches ?
just play the game and don't let any of these so called 0.3 ( 1-2% ) fps issues spoil the fun
I watched the whole vid in HD and I seriously didn't notice anything different
mybe you could tell what is the XX:XX in the video so I can look back and see it
Edit: just noticed the seconde video :p
| -Newcloud- said: when you say you asked a hand full of people was that 360 owner as well? as for the video there was no differents that i saw maybe because its youtube quilty |
I spent my own time camparing the PS3 and X360 demo. The PS3 seems to spend more time below 30 fps. I felt it in the controls and saw it but I really had no basis other than my own dectection. The second video on the link I posted shows the actual frame rates for each system at the top corner.
I'd also mentioned that the PS3 version seemed more jaggy to me. There's a reason for that too.
http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/face-off-resident-evil-5-article
This is the only reason why I hate the HD generation of gaming, people care more about looks than wether or not a game is good.
Seriously, 0.3?! And folks are getting their panties in a twist?!
Until we get a definete difference e.g stick figures vs HD I think these threads/comparisons are non-issues.
About Us |
Terms of Use |
Privacy Policy |
Advertise |
Staff |
Contact
Display As Desktop
Display As Mobile
© 2006-2025 VGChartz Ltd. All rights reserved.


