Bummer, I thought this game looked decent.
I don't get it, the score averages out to a 6.1. Why did they put a 3?
Tag (Courtesy of Fkusumot) "If I'm posting in this thread then it's probally a spam thread."
i was hoping this game to be good, last sonic game i really liked was sonic adventure 2, i guess the wait for good sonic game continues, i will still give this game a try though.
How much did they give Sonic the Hedgehog(X360/PS3) and Sonic unleashed?
Is this worse?
Sega is doing a great job with other games VC, Yakuza,Madworld (their are a few exceptions) while they can't create a decent Sonic game?
| c03n3nj0 said: Bummer, I thought this game looked decent. I don't get it, the score avarages out to a 6.1. Why did they put a 3? |
Out of 10 but not an average.
| Lostplanet22 said: How much did they give Sonic the Hedgehog(X360/PS3) and Sonic unleashed? Is this worse? |
They gave Sonic the Hedgehog a 4.8 (360) and a 4.2 (PS3).
So... IGN believes Black Knight to be worse than Sonic the Hedgehog. Oh boy...
*A lone tear runs down Smeags' ahsen face*
| c03n3nj0 said: Bummer, I thought this game looked decent. |
You better buy the OST(CD with music of the game) because that is the only thing that is enjoyable. The game is only fun for ninjabread fans.
My personal summary of the review.
Can we now finally give up on Sonic?
(waits till reviews of next Sonic cash-in to ask this question again)
A game I'm developing with some friends:
www.xnagg.com/zombieasteroids/publish.htm
It is largely a technical exercise but feedback is appreciated.
I didn't expect the game to be good at all, but damn, what a low score.
Sonic + Sword was a shitty concept anyways, I never get the appeal in that. :/
About Us |
Terms of Use |
Privacy Policy |
Advertise |
Staff |
Contact
Display As Desktop
Display As Mobile
© 2006-2026 VGChartz Ltd. All rights reserved.




