So after 2 extra years in development Killzone 2 gets 91 compared to Halo 3: 94

Would you say the campaign let Killzone 2 down or the lack of variation or even the multiplayer?

Personally I think Killzone 2 has surpassed Halo 3 graphics and is amazing however graphics don't count as much anymore..

Thoughts please :)

This will end in a tea party I'm guessing....I feel that both are too high but that's because I dislike shooters...

Halo 3 is overrated

/thread

I haven't played Killzone 2 but the multiplayer in Halo 3 is very fun.

RUNS FOR COVER!

Seriously, I am a huge Halo 3 fan and I wouldn't touch this one with a 10 foot pole. Both have there pro's and con's, unfortunately this thread is going to explode in fanboy carnage!

I dont like metacritic because our reviews aren't listed yet so I don't use it. Once we are listed then it gets my full endorsement =)

who said we should use emta critics?

according to game stat

halo 3:9.4(after 70 reviews)
http://www.gamestats.com/objects/734/734817/articles.html

killzone 2:9.4 (after 84 reivews)
http://www.gamestats.com/objects/748/748475/articles.html



in ther words killzone 2 is better :P

let's not do the n4g meta review omparsion cause on n4g meta review:

halo 3:8.9
killzone 2 :9.2

Nobody really cares about precise ratings, but I will say that a 9/10 for an FPS post CoD 4, is better than a 9/10 before CoD 4, that game just changed the console genre, it was just so incredibly good, but more Xbox owners bought Halo 3 than it... I just don't get it

More on topic: If I just compare the SPs, I think KZ2 is far far far better, but I think it suffered as it was not that original, and for some reason making a great game, that does feel slightly familiar, is punished. I know innovation should be encouraged, but it is still a great campaign

I liked the first two Halo games but the third was definitely overrated. Maybe if Guerrilla Games had spent more money on advertising they would have received better review scores.

everyone uses and mentions metacritic!