By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Sony Discussion - Thank you Sony for not ruining the PS4!

Below is a hasty translation of the paragraph dealing with SCE talking to the third parties. I don't have any technical knowledge at all, so please excuse me if I've misunderstood anything about the Larrabee etc there.

There is more on the PS4 in the next paragraph, but it's just conjecture and stuff like Sony wants to bring about the next generation sooner than anyone else.

 

SCE who investigated the reaction of third parties to the use of an extension of the cell

 

In early autumn of last year SCE asked around each of the game vendors to gauge their reaction with regards to the PS4.  SCE was sounding out what would happen if they used an extension of the Cell B.E. in the PS4. We reported on the situation at that time in our article “Playstation 4 heading towards using an extension of the cell”.

 

In that article from half a year ago we conjectured that SCE was having specific debates over the use of an extension of the Cell. However, in actual fact, SCE’s real intention lay in finding out what the reaction from software vendors would be if they used the Cell in the PS4.  They hadn’t begun a specific hardware design with a Cell base, but rather undecided on whether to use the Cell or not, SCE was in a phase where they were trying to find out where the industry was going. We think that they were trying to find out whether they could receive support from vendors if they released a PS4 using the Cell.

 

However, there was a lot of negative reaction from third party vendors at that time. In contrast SCE’s first parties (SCE’s game studios)  were positive towards development of the Cell. This is because the powerful first part studios are drawing out the power of the Cell. In other words, SCE is stuck between deciding whether to make use of the strengths of their internal game development by releasing a “Cell” PS4 or gain the support of third parties by releasing a “non Cell” PS4.

 

While SCE are investigating vendors’ attitudes towards a Cell PS4, they are also looking at other CPU/GPUs. In particular, the one which has caught SCE’s attention is the Larrabee Throughput processor announced by Intel. The Larrabee is a throughput processor extending a general use x86 CPU Core and demonstrating a performance in line with a GPU. If they put it in a console just with the Larrabee they can combine a CPU and GPU. From the perspective of a games developer, it would mean they could program for the GPU in the same was as the CPU and the gap between the CPU and GPU would disappear for the program.

 

 



Around the Network

That is a very easily readable (and illuminating) translation. Did you do it yourself?



It's very kind of you to say so.

It's a bit late to the thread now though, so there probably wasn't much point in writing it.



Khuutra is scary.

Btw he's wrong...

*Runs!*



Tease.

Khuutra and I read it, so that's at least two people.

Judging from your translation, it seems the OP was full of crap. He was propably just trying to stir up trouble.



Switch Code: SW-7377-9189-3397 -- Nintendo Network ID: theRepublic -- Steam ID: theRepublic

Now Playing
Switch - Super Mario Maker 2 (2019)
Switch - The Legend of Zelda: Link's Awakening (2019)
Switch - Bastion (2011/2018)
3DS - Star Fox 64 3D (2011)
3DS - Phoenix Wright: Ace Attorney (Trilogy) (2005/2014)
Wii U - Darksiders: Warmastered Edition (2010/2017)
Mobile - The Simpson's Tapped Out and Yugioh Duel Links
PC - Deep Rock Galactic (2020)

Around the Network
ajmd20 said:

It's very kind of you to say so.

It's a bit late to the thread now though, so there probably wasn't much point in writing it.

Nonsense. Like theRepublic said, this puts the entire topic in an entirely different light.

I hope Sony does go down a different path.

@Squilliam:

NUH-UH



On Paragraph 3 subsection 7 when you claimed that the gaming market would have shrunk had the Wii not existed: Do you have proof to back up that claim?



Tease.

Squilliam said:
On Paragraph 3 subsection 7 when you claimed that the gaming market would have shrunk had the Wii not existed: Do you have proof to back up that claim?

Your question is invalidated, sir.

There is no subsection 7.