By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Sony - David Jaffe on Media Bias...

Sharky54 said:
badgenome said:

MSNBC. Biased? You don't say.

Still, I can't read this:

"(and not focusing on upcoming things that could swing the console's fortunes ((ala KILLZONE 2, GOW 3, UNCHARTED 2, MLB 09, potential price drop,etc)) )"

Without thinking of this:

 


 

He didn'ty say the PS3 needed saving. He mearly stated that such games can sell more PS3s. Which they do, correct?

He said that they "could swing the console's fortunes," which would indicate something more dramatic than merely moving a little more hardware.



Around the Network

So he got an email from a journalist who wanted to get a developer's opinion about Sony's mistakes with the PS3, and made a 6 minute video bitching about it.

I want my 6 minutes back.



My Mario Kart Wii friend code: 2707-1866-0957

Dear David,

 

 

 

Cheers,

 

Gebx



Proud Member of GAIBoWS (Gamers Against Irrational Bans of Weezy & Squilliam)

                   

Asking a developper like Jaffe questions about business is like asking a question about quantum mechanics to George Bush.



How many cups of darkness have I drank over the years? Even I don't know...

 

Looks to me a very common mentality amongst US media.

Of course the fact remains that the PS3 outperformed the 360 considerably taking equal timeframes, despite many extra months or even years of extra headstart (and more holiday seasons) taking such a measure. And despite having been sold at a much higher entry level pricing over this period and Microsoft shooting off its most anticipated games much earlier than Sony did.

The PS3 attracted mostly adult males, the Wii attracted mostly young preteen kids as well as many casual female gamers, the 360 mostly attracted young boys. Regarding me as an adult male, Sony's decisions resulted into a more relevant and solid userbase. Yes, highly specced and multi-featured the PS3 is not as much a cheap toy for kids, but I am personally very glad the PS3 is not specced like a Wii. What would the market have gained in terms of choice if there were 2 or 3 Wii-like products? There's still the PS2, which is still a nice Wii competitor (until a slimline PS3 considerably drops in price).

IMO that's a very valid perspective the US media seems to ignore at all cost. We also saw many very biased coverage of the Blu-Ray vs HD DVD conflict (HD DVD was technically inferior in every sense as well as lacking industry support in comparison to the support there was for Blu-Ray), IMO treat the bulk of US media coverage similar to this.



Naughty Dog: "At Naughty Dog, we're pretty sure we should be able to see leaps between games on the PS3 that are even bigger than they were on the PS2."

PS3 vs 360 sales

Around the Network

For David Jaffe to have answered these questions would imply....
-that he agrees with the phrasing. If he were to answer a questions phrased "because the PS3 is such a fail, what do you think of the upcoming line up"
No matter what his answer was it would mean that the PS3 is failing, which he might not actually believe.

The questions are riddled with this delimma.



      

      

      

Greatness Awaits

PSN:Forevercloud (looking for Soul Sacrifice Partners!!!)

forevercloud3000 said:
For David Jaffe to have answered these questions would imply....
-that he agrees with the phrasing. If he were to answer a questions phrased "because the PS3 is such a fail, what do you think of the upcoming line up"
No matter what his answer was it would mean that the PS3 is failing, which he might not actually believe.

The questions are riddled with this delimma.

Well, when life hands you a dilemma, make dilemmanade.

 



god he is talkative



MikeB said:

Looks to me a very common mentality amongst US media.

Of course the fact remains that the PS3 outperformed the 360 considerably taking equal timeframes, despite many extra months or even years of extra headstart (and more holiday seasons) taking such a measure. And despite having been sold at a much higher entry level pricing over this period and Microsoft shooting off its most anticipated games much earlier than Sony did.

The PS3 attracted mostly adult males, the Wii attracted mostly young preteen kids as well as many casual female gamers, the 360 mostly attracted young boys. Regarding me as an adult male, Sony's decisions resulted into a more relevant and solid userbase. Yes, highly specced and multi-featured the PS3 is not as much a cheap toy for kids, but I am personally very glad the PS3 is not specced like a Wii. What would the market have gained in terms of choice if there were 2 or 3 Wii-like products? There's still the PS2, which is still a nice Wii competitor (until a slimline PS3 considerably drops in price).

IMO that's a very valid perspective the US media seems to ignore at all cost. We also saw many very biased coverage of the Blu-Ray vs HD DVD conflict (HD DVD was technically inferior in every sense as well as lacking industry support in comparison to the support there was for Blu-Ray), IMO treat the bulk of US media coverage similar to this.

Hahaha this is a great joke post!

Good stuff Mike! Keep it up dude.

 



Tease.

wow who really cares what the media says. The media is biased on just about everything not just gaming. If u trust the media than u deserve to be shot.



Long Live SHIO!