By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Nintendo - Cruis'n Wii looks...well, just look...

That blue car looks like it bent forward, and got a little bit deformed, or some thing, in the middle of the air. By the way, did it ever occur to you that the game's graphics are not yet polished? Perhaps it is unfinished. And besides, it will look different when seen on a T.V. Even if it will look like that, it has the same graphics as early Xbox games, and definitely not Playstation, or Nintendo 64 level. It's not that bad. And there are "jaggles" in all screen shots, of all games, some just more than others. It's not whether a game has these "jaggles" or not, it's how many, and how ridged the "jaggles" are. In this case, the game has big "jaggles," but once the game is finished, I'm sure it will look nicer. By the way, the "night time" screen shot looks better than the "day time" one.



Around the Network
a.l.e.x59 said:
That blue car looks like it bent forward, and got a little bit deformed, or some thing, in the middle of the air. By the way, did it ever occur to you that the game's graphics are not yet polished? Perhaps it is unfinished. And besides, it will look different when seen on a T.V. Even if it will look like that, it has the same graphics as early Xbox games, and definitely not Playstation, or Nintendo 64 level. It's not that bad. And there are "jaggles" in all screen shots, of all games, some just more than others. It's not whether a game has these "jaggles" or not, it's how many, and how ridged the "jaggles" are. In this case, the game has big "jaggles," but once the game is finished, I'm sure it will look nicer. By the way, the "night time" screen shot looks better than the "day time" one.

That's funny, because I think the N64 game looks better...

 



Tag - "No trolling on my watch!"

I guess it'd be more efficient if they just released Crusin' USA on the VC.



-Manella: Yeah... sux0rz! I hate missing out on food...
-Maya: Nick... what does "Sucksores" mean?
-Phoenix: No idea...

I'd rather play Beetle Adventure Racing on the VC.



 

Wii version is slightly more defined. It beats the Nintendo 64 version, but not by very much. The only reason why the Nintendo 64 version may look better is because of that giant arch that goes over the road. Pretend the arch is non-existent, and you will know that the Wii version is better. Never-the-less, if the Wii version is going to look like those screen shots, that's just embarassing.



Around the Network

This games just exist as the proof that some developers are lazy... no matter if they are working on the easiest or the hardest console to program.



Wow. Good thing Nin fans hate gfx. Cause I wouldn't play that piece of shit. Ps2 has way better gfx than that!



  Unleash The Beast!  

End of 2011 Sales: Wii = 90mil, 360 = 61mil, PS3= 60mil

Actually, many Playstation 2 games have worse graphics than this.



a.l.e.x59 said:
Actually, many Playstation 2 games have worse graphics than this.

 Not many and I can't think of any off the top of my head.  Perhaps some of the games within the first year or so were this lazy on the textures because they still could be (this screenshot would be acceptable for a N64 or PS1 game) but the bar got raised fairly quickly for PS2 games.

There's no way around it, if that screenshot demonstrates the final look of the game that is just purely unacceptable. 



I heard that those are not Wii Cruis´n screenshots.
Looking closely to the screens, most of them show "F&F" (Fast & Furious) in the menus, and you can read "press gas to choose" etc... They could be from a F&F arcade cabinet...
There are only one screen (circuit selection) with Wii buttons , but they look "photoshopped", and the screen seems from Cruis´n World for N64.
Can you confirm this?