5 is a little harsh, going from the demo I would have said 7 or 8. But thats the demo, I was figuring it would've gotten better later in the game like the 1st one.

yea,,hopefully it will stay above 8 on metacritics when it's all said and done.

You left out the first line that preamble's the paragraph.

"A robot suit and quick-time events.

If you grabbed me in a bar and asked me what was memorably new in FEAR 2 (I'm not using the bloody full stops), that's all I'd be able to come up with..."

Quick-time events? They actually put Quick-time events in a F.E.A.R. 2? Why? One of the things I loved about the first one is how largely you remain in control of your character as things happen around you, and Eurogamer is saying they put QTE's in the sequel? I already hated the mech suit crap from playing the Demo, now it sounds like they just re-did the first F.E.A.R. and added useless crap. Ugh.

meh...still would rather play this over killzone 2 any day...demo was great.

what does this thread has to do with KZ2?don't be such a fanboy man.

you also rather play alone in the dark over MGS4,casue it's a better game ,,,amirite?lol XD

Kinda hard to play a game on a console you don't own.

You did use hammers, word as a title, so i think that this tread is a payback from the killzone 2 edge review. Am i right?

 There are posts before mine that reference killzone 2 as "superior". Don't cherry pick when you're calling people fanboys... I would rather play alone in the dark than play MGS4 again yes...is that a problem? PS3 version would be awesome actually...

bad taste i guess can be a gift some times ,,,amirite? ;)

you are the kind that if you owned PS3 only, you would say: I rather play haze than halo 3 anyday .

Something tells me that this game would have got a better score has it not been for Killzone 2 setting the bar so high for future shooters.

That being said i hated the demo.