I say the it wont be on 360. Instead it will be a Wii exclusive. and maybe on Ps3.
I say the it wont be on 360. Instead it will be a Wii exclusive. and maybe on Ps3.
I think it will be a multiplatform release on the PS3/Xbox 360//I think the Wii will get some type of significant spin-off//so Square Enix can recoup some development costs from the 360/PS3 counterparts.
Or
It could just be a Wii exlusive and Nintendo & Square Enix can announce a deal for it to do so on the Wii.
Certainly won't matter to me considering I own all three from this generation and last generation//including the handhelds//lol
| fabledgamer said: they should release kh3 in 3 episodes. one episode on every console just to make everyone happy lol |
Kingdom Hearts 3, Kingdom Hearts Versus 3, and Kingdom Hearts Agito 3?
XD
thekitchensink said:
Kingdom Hearts 3, Kingdom Hearts Versus 3, and Kingdom Hearts Agito 3?
|
haha//its so similar to Final Fantasy XIII, Final Fantasy Versus XIII, and Final Fantasy Agito XIII!
XD
either the wii or multiplat.
hopefully the wii, but if its on one of the HD consoles, itll be on the other, cause they want money
if KH3 is released it is goin to be on the ps3 exclusively
FF and SOA are games that dont have a constant story each installments..so it being multiplat wont matter much since you can play 4 and not kno what happen in 1
but KH series has a story continuing from thru 2 and it will continue on 3
thats my logic on why it would be exclusive
could be wrong look at DMC4..
Soriku said:
Goddamit.....I'm getting sick of this saying. The only consoles that Disney brings in profits from are on the Wii and DS. All the HD consoles got was Turok and Pure exclusive, which didn't do very well. KH3 is a completely different game than those two. And if it's budget we're talking about, Pure had a larger budget than those games only because it's an HD game....and look at how much it sold compared to Wii/DS games that have lower budgets and higher sales. And the "loyalty" concept doesn't hold any weight, because the games on the HD consoles started years ago. Putting games on the Wii with a high userbase seems like a good idea, just look at where DQ X went. Not the DS. But the Wii. Even with Nomura at the helm, it definitely doesn't matter. They decided to port FFXIII, and put it on the 360 and wasn't a toss up because some of the biggest selling HD games this gen are multiplat and doing the same to FF XIII would be doing the right then. I see it as a shoe in for the Wii, even if you don't think it is. |
So because Hannah Montana cost $5 to make, and all the little kids that are on her bandwagon bought that game up and brought Disney a profit, KH3 is the same? Is KH3 as small as those games? I could have sworn that it was up there with Final Fantasy. And I would say that loyalty does hold weight, because otherwise why would SE games continue to be announced for the HD consoles? Did you hear of Infinite Undiscovery in 2005? 2006 even? Just because the Wii has a high userbase, that doesn't mean the game will sell well. Look at CoD:WaW. The demographic matters. If all the owners of the Wii were 4 year olds, do you think certain games would sell, despite the userbase technically being high? I would dare to say that the Wii userbase is an inflated number because most are "non-gamers". DQX is only ONE big SE game that's on the Wii. The rest are on the HD consoles, so don't let it go to your head.
And because Nomura is the lead designer, that definitely is going to be a factor in where it goes. Do you think if some other guy made MGS4, it would have been PS3 exclusive? It was because of Kojima that MGS4 is exclusive, and it's because of Nomura that FFvXIII is staying exclusive. When you think about it....who's making the game DOES matter.
And about FFXIII going multiplatform. You KNOW there was something going on behind the scenes....otherwise, why aren't they releasing it when it finishes on the PS3, which we know is going to be done first? Why do we have to wait extra months for the 360 to get done, when the PS3 version will be sitting on SE shelves, ready to be bought by the masses? M$ money, that's why.
If the Wii is simply "taking over" why aren't they porting FFXIII to the Wii then? The game is on Crystal Tools which apparently can run on the Wii. I've seen you say that you think FFXIII is a "casual" game. Why isn't this also being put on the Wii?
KH3 is a big budget game, and as you said "the biggest budget HD games are multiplatform and that's the right thing to do" so.....why do you think it should only be on the Wii, and not at least HD multiplatform?

Shadowblind said:
When you take Nintendo-published games out of the software sales, how much does it still beat it by?
|
THIS x infinity.
Unless he thinks KH3 is going to sell because something Game Party sold a million

| star_city said: if KH3 is released it is goin to be on the ps3 exclusively FF and SOA are games that dont have a constant story each installments..so it being multiplat wont matter much since you can play 4 and not kno what happen in 1 but KH series has a story continuing from thru 2 and it will continue on 3 thats my logic on why it would be exclusive could be wrong look at DMC4.. |
Yea but its not like all ps3 owners were ps2 owners so you cant expect them to know the story either , hell there could even be more ps2 to 360 owners than ps2 to ps3 owners.
With all the love square is showing the 360 the J man wouldnt be surprised if it was released multiplat.
N64 is the ONLY console of the fifth generation!!!