ZenfoldorVGI said:
Screw it.
You know what I think is a bad console?
The Playstation 3.
For the value, maybe, but its pretty damn good as a CONSOLE. Controller aside of course.
The first reason is simple. Sony, the company behind the machine, decided that the brand was strong enough that they would be able to saddle it with another, lesser brand from an unrelated arm of the company, and consumers would still buy it.
I'm not gonna argue with this because Sony allienated me with the BS they through at my beloved homebrew community and closing down Lik-Sang. Sony can rot for that.
They said, "Remember the PS2!? Well, now we have the playstation 3...except you have to buy this new thing we invented, Blu-Ray, if you want to buy one. It's 199 extra and completely needless. We're only adding it on because we know you wouldn't buy it otherwise, and we think that you will buy our console based on brand alone, regardless of price point."
Blu-Ray does add some nice space for more game content. While I do agree that it wasn't a neccesity, it did help them win the HD format war. I just hope they still think that winning Blu-Ray was worth the cost of they're Playstation brand.
Well, unfortunately we did buy it. Barely. Just enough to raise the BR brand, while the PS brand sunk, and sunk, and sunk.
In fact, all of the 3rd party franchises that use to be saddled to the Playstation brand, didn't have anymore room to ride, thanks to the monumental Blu-Ray blunder. They went multiplat.
On top of this horrible, terrible, affront to gamers, called Blu-Ray, Sony also had the nerve to release exactly 0 good exclusive games for the first year of the console, which was around 600 USD. The console blew chunks, then, worse than any console ever. It was the worst console on the market, ever. It sucked. The Wii blew it away. Yes, yes it did. Zelda and Galaxy destroyed the PS3 library, and the price was once again, much, much cheaper.
Now, two years after the horrible launch, the console is getting some good exclusives. However, it is still bundled with the useless BR player, and its back catalog of games is still hovering around the "shit" classification. Yet, it stubbornly remains at the 400 dollar plus 50 dollars sales tax pricepoint.
Now, I'm being asked to buy the console, immediately before an obvious pricecut, by Sony fanboys, who don't care about me and my value, but instead just about the extra sale...based solely on the promise that MGS4/LBP, 2 relatively niche games, are great, and the upcoming PS3 exclusives might be great as well.
LBP was a letdown for me. MGS4 demo was boring. Don't know about the full game though.
F that.
The console is past tense to me. Its greatness can never match the PS2, and it would take years to catch the Xbox 360, which itself already has a fantastic library, with multiplats that are better than their PS3 counterparts, at a price point of 199 USDollars, and which doesn't force me to buy, support, or have anything to do with a needless, pointless, and luxurious peripheral that I don't need, want, or understand.
Understand though that the PS2 was GODLY, especially to me. Oddly enough, my absolute undying love for it is getting familiar with the 360. But PS2 is still a few degrees above it. I do hate how the PS name has basically sold consoles at this point. Think if Neo-Geo released it with a different name. Wouldn't have sold passed 2 mil.
I think playing beyond, before the price cut, is ignorant. I think it has been ignorant since the system launched, and I think it will probably still be ignorant after the price cut as well. The people who have bought the console, imho, have been cheated, and overpaid for an inferior product. They have been made pawns of a marketing scheme, and bought an expensive item based on brand instead of quality and common sense.
For now, yes I have. I await my glorious God of War 3, however, and hopefully KH3.
Why didn't I play beyond?
Because I thought before.
This thread must be a f'n joke.
|