I knew this was going to happen because it happened back in 2004 when halo 2 came out, Killzone was hailed and hyped to be sonys answer to halo 2, we all know how that went, the same thing will happen again.
HALO 3 ODST.
halo3 looks very good considering its built off of a highly modifited halo2 engine. and not a engine that was built from the ground up and if it did it would look just as good as killzone 2.
GAMERTAG IS ANIMEHEAVEN X23
PSN ID IS : ANIMEREALM
PROUD MEMBER OF THE RPG FAN CLUB THREAD
ALL-TIME FAVORITE JRPG IS : LOST ODYSSEY
| ROBOTECHHEAVEN said: halo3 looks very good considering its built off of a highly modifited halo2 engine. and not a engine that was built from the ground up and if it did it would look just as good as killzone 2. |
Technologically speaking, Halo 3 has the most realistic and interactive (may be 2nd or 3rd by now) water of this generation. Only way Halo will look as good as Killzone is if Bungie's staff suddenly triples or if they spend over 4 years on the game.
Good news Everyone!
I've invented a device which makes you read this in your head, in my voice!
amazing!
Currently waiting on : killzone 2 and everything else after it..day one purchase baby
Halo 3 was a disappointment graphically, particularly after that trailer they showed at E3. Halo 3 just didn't show much. Oh, it was competent, and a decent closure for the Halo trilogy, but graphics are not its strong suit. Single player isn't really either. Gears 2 beats it in that area.
The mods and new mods for Halo 3 is impressive though.
Who cares ps3 beats wii in power but we we how that's going. Killzone 2 won't be bigger than any halo game, but hey at least it looks better ha ha ha who cares.
Wow I remember how gray KZ2 was back then haha. So glad they fixed that. Would have just looked fugly. But on a graphical standpoint KZ2 does look better but I like that Halo uses colors. So few shooters nowadays use the full color palette which is well disturbing. Halo 3 makes full use of them which is just awesome. Kudos to them.
Either way, though not like it matters too much. I'll just keep with the H3 online and be happy.
jetrii said:
Although Too Human had 5+ years, it lacked both a competent developer and money. Although SK made one of my favorites games, Eternal Darkness, they have serious planning issues. I stand by what I said. Give Naughty Dog or Bioware 5 years, more money, and more employees and you'll have yourself a game that in all probability would look as good as Killzone 2. |
Eternal Darkness says "hi".
Try again.
Or check out my new webcomic: http://selfcentent.com/
Sigh.
Nobody is saying that Killzone 2 is better than Halo 3! (It is, though)
All we are saying is that Killzone 2 has better graphics! Can anybody here actually argue that Halo 3's graphics are better than those of Killzone 2? Killzone 2 is what, one and a half years newer than Halo 3? Of course it looks better!
This reminds me of that PS3 song, "Say Halo 3 don't worry you, instead you offer Killzone 2! Killzone 1 sucked before, what made you think we wanted more?"
Such a 2007 way of thinking 
(Former) Lead Moderator and (Eternal) VGC Detective 
JaggedSac said:
So work didn't begin on the game until several months after the E3 where they showed gameplay footage? No design work, no architectural discussions, nothing, but somehow they got some pre renders developed? Most likely wasn't 5+ years, but it was definitely more than 3 years 2 months.
|
Yes the video shown might aswell be killzone 1. Did you see anything not present in killzone 1 in it ? i didn't.
Check out my game about moles ^
About Us |
Terms of Use |
Privacy Policy |
Advertise |
Staff |
Contact
Display As Desktop
Display As Mobile
© 2006-2025 VGChartz Ltd. All rights reserved.
