reviewing drunken retards or games ?

They do both apparently, but they're probably more qualified to aptly review drunkards.

I guess it all depends on who did the review.  Do they even receive a review copy of the game to play? Or just assign random scores to games based on cover art?

what the hell is the maxim review doing there?

that should be removed ,,,no non gaming magazine/fOrum Reviews should be added period.(just like N4g)

^nice sig
maxim's review shouldn't be in the list it doesn't make sens, the review only shows how popular the game will be amongst their reader and they definitively think fiddy blood in the sand will be more popular then killfuckingzone 2

^ Nice Avatar =)

I don't ever remember seeing anyone quote a Maxim review score anywhere else, let alone from a picture of said review.  Seems odd, especially since their review process involves a one-eyed monkey tossing darts at a spinning wheel with numbers on it...

The demo hits the 5th, and the embargo on reviews ends the 2nd. I think this shows that Sony has great confidence in the game.

A month's worth of extremely positive reviews (both by journalists and those who played the demo) could lead to much larger week one sales than might've happened otherwise.

By the way, join the official clan!

http://tv.gamestar.hu/video/killzone-2-gameplay-es-intro-hi-res

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lz8sIGlLbo0

Watch in high quality!!!

Please take that Maxim review off. It doesn't even appear to be a gaming magazine. It's a load of crap. Look at the score they gave to SFIV.

Or do what metacritic does, and average it out. List it, but give it 1/100 of the influence of IGN.

EDIT: Or put shitty reviewer next to it in bold, and strike through it. I suppose just removing it is simpler.