Actually, I was referring to Edomites.  I didn't even think of Sodomites until after it was too late.

they fail the same way other major gaming sites and magazines have failed to see the broader workings of the gaming industry. Wii Music is something different and unique and they bash it and wish for it to fail? Then complain that gaming is getting stale?

I've come ot my own realization that gaming sites such as IGN or magazines like GI are out of touch with the mainstream consumer. After the perfect 10 scores for GTAIV I began to take IGN's opinions with a grain of salt.

It's kind of sad that IGN staff actually believed they had the kind of influence they thought they did. I mean really, realistically, they're one website, and hardly the definitive website for Nintendo-related news at that. About all they really did was draw more attention to the game from anybody who saw their poorly written and highly unprofessional review of it.

      Yes, but if one had some kind of ulterior motive either for or against Wii Music, then couldn't it be said that their ulterior motive was responsible or compelling them to feel the way that they do about the game?  Couldn't it be an uncontrolled variable that was responsible for their feelings of favor towards or negative feelings against Wii Music?

     Naturally the people that have a strong liking for the Wii and its games are going to feel more favorable towards Wii Music than fans of other consoles that don't say they particularly enjoy the game.

     From what I've read from the favorable crowd for Wii Music. It is a game that you can enjoy if you want to learn to make music and that you must have some musical talent to really get the most from it.  I would expect a gaming site that was reviewing such a game for a general public that might not want to put that much effort into such a game that quite a few people in that mass audience wouldn't have the talent to find much enjoyment from to begin with and that they wouldn't want to invest the time to develop dormant music talents in, wouldn't rate such a game as a must purchase item for most people.  It's like if a company made an accounting software program that would teach you how to be an accountant.  Well, if you're reveiwing the program for a mainstream audience and knew that many of them didn't want to be CPA's, then would you review the program as something that everybody in that audience needs to rush out and enjoy?

Nintendo should request a voir dire out of the reviewers.

This is the kind of thing that reduces igns street credit. Why cant they just give credit where its due?

Back to cognitive dissonance?  Very well, let's see what was said last time on that topic. 
--noname2200 mentioned "confirmation bias", the tendency to see the result you want to see. 
--You responded that the major review sites were negative, so it's not bias, just the truth, and anyway you disliked what you saw on the video.

Now, HappySquirrel had made an earlier post on this subject: 
Now, there are very few games which legitimately have 50% of their review scores above 70% (with 25% above 80%) and also have a lot of scores in the 30%, 40% and 50% range ... Now, when you have reviewers bragging about how they are going to trash a game before they have played it the reason why there is such a discrepancy becomes clear.

The reason he was alluding to is of course that the people choosing to give it low scores were biased -- they refused to give the game a fair chance because they had already decided that it must suck, or were simply subconsciously predisposed to be unfairly harsh on the game. 

Moving on, I presume you're pronouncing "Wiistian" as 'Weestchin', since the ending is the same as in Christian.  But not only does that not sound catchy, it also does not naturally make me think of associating it with the word Christian.  I don't know exactly why, but it's true, and if I am a common example, then it's basically just an in-joke that you have to explain every time you use it in front of new people, which makes it ineffective as an insult or otherwise. 

"Wiilistine", on the other hand, may not have as many people recognize the root word (once explained), but will probably have more people recognize it without assistance IMO, and certainly have more people make the correct association.  (Some people might make the Wii-Christian association, for example, but fail to realize the 'Wii=Jesus' mentality you are trying to imply.  In contrast, I can't think of another way to interpret a Wii-Philistine association.) 

I'd consider "Wii cultist" to be less insulting than "Wiiligious zealot", and also more attractive to people who dislike wordplay.  That might be your best bet, or something similar like "Wii fanatic", etc.  It doesn't really matter, you know, since all your cute little derogatory appellations will utterly fail to catch on, much less have any effect. [edit:  I think others are way ahead of me.]

 Indeed, but it is explained by other ideas. Confirmation bias (as suggested earlier by noname) is a much more likely factor. They either really wanted to like or hate the game and found the faults or lack there of as a consequence. This isn't really the same as tricking yourself into enjoying it though, so much as tricking yourself into not caring about the bad spots or good spots depending. So really it detracts from the validity of both sides fairly equally.

 I would review it based on how fun it seems to be, and how well it was made. I wouldn't go into the review hating it though as that would almost certainly skew the results. IGN as a whole clearly hated the game from longbefore they reviewed it. This is made crystal clear by at least one article written in the wake of the games release. As such their review can be discredited rather easily. Given this is a strong trend in gaming review sites it would be safe to say the Metacritic/Gameranking score is not the best reflection of the games over-all quality. I would say the same of a lot of games though so take that for what it is worth.

I think it will be a good thing in schools.

     Wiibrews fits as the Wii has been kind of a Promised Land for the Nintendo faithful that was out wondering in the desert with the N64 and GCN for eight years.