That better be some goddamn disease infested crow.

I would like to continue the discussion, now that we aren't interrupting Dolla's Crow topic. What makes you think it's CGI now? It's not in any existing trailers (nor is even the level Link is in), and there are many screenshots that match or even excede that one in quality.

It's official: The Wii can do graphics to the level of CGI.

And the email I got from somebody asking me why I was a Holocaust denier?  Was that far away from reality to?  Why don't you mind your own business?  You're the same person who said Nintendo should patent the biofeedback device, you know the one they didn't invent or even use in a game so honestly why should I care what your opinion is?  I proved you wrong in another thread so you come in here and insult me?

I dunno...I pretty much am spent after explaining myself thoroughly in the "eat crow" thread.

All the screenshots from smashbros.com are ACTUAL screenshots taken from the game, except for the ones dealing with the Subspace Emissary, which still use ingame models, but are cutscenes that undoubtedly feature more particles, effects, but mostly character animation that doesn't happen ingame.

It'd be more interesting to argue about the E3 05 Killzone 2 trailer, because it was ambiguous, possibly CGI, probably CGI, not sure if the final game would look that, etc.

We know what Brawl will look like while we play. It will look like this:

and this.

and etc. Pick and choose any of the screenshots from www.smashbros.com

They're all screenshots from the actual game. I'm tired of this. There's not really anything to debate about...just apparently stuff to explain, that's all.

Please lock this thread, it's turned into nothing more than a flamefest and a beat up on Legend11 thread.

Yeah I guess Ben, I'm just trying to figure out his reasoning now. Everything on the website looks like that, and there is no way Nintendo fabricated almost 400 in-game screens. Even if they could fabricate screens, they couldn't possibly do it fast enough to release daily updates.

There is CGI mixed in with actual in-game screens. The main character portraits are obviously CGI for some of them (like Wario). I give up arguing, this is my last post on the subject.

ps.  I regret pointing out that the E3 06 trailer was CGI, had I known the uproar it was going to cause I would have just kept it to myself.

*sigh* guess that's as close to "sorry I was wrong" as I'm going to get. Oh well. I am a big fan of smash and I will defend it when it's falsely criticized. I figure most people have seen the point though so I guess this discussion is as completed as it will get.

The appeal of these screenshots is that's what they'll really look like.

Besides, even if Wario's portrait is CG, does it really matter?  It's just a portrait, and he looks EXACTLY the same in the ingame screenshots.

I know you're not posting anymore, but look at Peach.

That's her "character portrait" which you might claim is CG.

But she looks identical ingame...because they are the same...it's all the same.