what u dont know is if killzone 2 run in the PC its will run in 60fps at 1080p easily with extra textures and shadows also with 8x AA that not the ps3 or the 360 can do it ... but the game still looks cool lol :P .. and to be honest its really looks better than halo 3 .. i know its sad for some of u people but the truth is truth u cant change it with words.
Moar Sony hype BS?????
Im putting this next to the R2 looks better than Gears thread so we can LOL at them.
^Serious?
I think its:
Crysis>Uncharted 2>Killzone 2>>Gears 2>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Halo 3.
If you think KZ2 will look the same as R2 you need shot
| Badassbab said: Where here is an almost definate first.... A poor game franchise which is getting a sequel that might actually be a far superior to the first one. When is the last time you heard of a developer making a sequel to a piss poor first game with this level of hype and anticipation? Sony and Guerilla have really pulled out all the stops to turn Killzone into Playstations own Halo (which was the original aim). Looks like this time they will succeed. Now that's commitment. |
first game wasn't pisspoor. It was average.
Check out my game about moles ^
This looks like SDF work.
Three cheers for the SDF! Now another three for Killzone 2! And yet another three for Sony! And...
You get the idea.
(Former) Lead Moderator and (Eternal) VGC Detective 
| starcraft said: I will just quickly point out that that website has an established history of Sony-leaning articles. To the point you have to wonder if they have any idea what's actually going on in the world of gaming. Once again I'll simply state that Killzone 2 looks like a marginal graphical improvement on Gears of War 2, which itself looks nothing like as good as Crysis. At the end of the day Sony has spent anywhere between $60-100 million on a game on ostensibly the most powerful console (even if the difference over the Xbox 360 is marginal) over the course of four years with work spanning at least three studios and they STILL fall FAR short of Crysis. Console's haven't peaked (none of them), but it's fair to say Crysis is safe. |
this website has also published a lot of shitty anti-PS3 (edited) article that u used to post on VGChartz
...
EDIT : just an example from May07
http://gamer.blorge.com/2007/05/29/ps3-price-cut-will-not-save-it/
Time to Work !
No, it does not. Can you get close to a wall in KZ2 and not see blocky textures, the way you can in Crysis?
From the screenshots I saw, you can't, so the answer is "no".
My Mario Kart Wii friend code: 2707-1866-0957
| haxxiy said: Physics is better (what else you could expect, Cell vs Pentium 4) but graphics wise hell no. I mean, even on 720p Crysis need what, 500 megatexels per frame... Still looks as good as a console game can be. |
Watch this then talk again:
Killzone has nuffin on Crysis. It looks good, but not impressive because it's a corridor shooter and a master of one thousand shades of grey.
Technically Crisis beats everything, but personally I'm not very fond of Crisis grafix - I'm annoyed by how grainy and pixelated the graphics look, I hate it!
Gears of War 2 grafix are overrated as well. Simply another corridor shooter without colors.
Far Cry 2 - at least on PC - have better grafix than Crysis, Killzone, Gears 2 IMO. Even Uncharted and Fable 2 look better.
About Us |
Terms of Use |
Privacy Policy |
Advertise |
Staff |
Contact
Display As Desktop
Display As Mobile
© 2006-2025 VGChartz Ltd. All rights reserved.
