| Diomedes1976 said: MS feared that most multimedia things usually PC-related moved to the living room and SOny would control them from one point on ...specially as Sony didnt want to use their propietary software and keep their "I create crap software and then sit and receive billions year after year " virtuous cycle working .... |
Damage control?
HD-DVD vs BluRay was never a priority for MS like it was for Sony. Sony had to use its biggest gun, the playstation, to win this and MS didn't do anything besides a external HD-DVD-Drive for the Xbox360. Toshiba / MS and who knows who else supported HD-DVD paid 150million USD to Paramount / Dreamworks to be exclusive for 18 months. At the same time MS offered yahoo 45 billion USD. Now you can see where the priorities of MS were. MS always focused on VoD.
Besides that the Blu uses a MS-codec.
And why the hell are you talking about PS3-features that don't have to do with anything? If those features would be as important as you describe, the PS3 would sell better.
MS did an awesome job to prevent Sony from getting too powerful and they established a Xbox Live community with 17 million UNIQUE users worldwide. They made more than one billion Dollar since Xbox360s launch on the marketplace. I doubt Sony will see such numbers on the PSN.
Imagine not having GamePass on your console...








