In terms of game quality the ps3 and 360 were equal this year, though mgs was clearly goty. Both are great systems. The Wii outsold them both, but lacked the software quality that the hd consoles had. so its all how you interpret it.
In terms of game quality the ps3 and 360 were equal this year, though mgs was clearly goty. Both are great systems. The Wii outsold them both, but lacked the software quality that the hd consoles had. so its all how you interpret it.
| forevercloud3000 said: @NightSurge I think it is you who are not willing to see the truth. Which is the correct way of telling which system is SOTY? Is it... A. By sales B. By quality/quantity of games, as well as bonuses within the year C. A mixture of both If A is true... -360 did better in sales 07 and 08, by a small margin both times being less then 1mill apart. -360 would be the correct SOTY then! Yet, everyone says this is not how we decide. If B is true... -in 07 PS3 had lackluster game selection. 360 Won hands down. -in 08 PS3's game selection blew 360's out of the water with such highly rated exclusives and gaining a few of old 360 exclusives(Bioshock and Eternal SOnata). 360 gained FFXIII as a MP title. Both companies went for a price drop at different times of the year. -PS3 would be the winner with more going for it this year such as Games quality and amount of them, had a price cut, HOME released, and gained two ex 360 exclusives. IF C is true... -07 360 won hands down with better sales and games. -08 PS3 had better games, but slightly lower sales trailing by a mere 600k. 360 didn't have the game selection of PS3, but due to price drop out performed PS3 in sales. -Conclusion: DRAW both were on par with each other. Where one excelled in sales the other excelled in software. This is the point I have been trying to make for the last 8 pages that you do not seem to be getting. |
Really? I thought your point was that 2008 was the year of the PS3. For the majority of your posts, you were trying to convince us that this year was still the year of the PS3. You seem to think the PS3 is treated unfairly by the press. Those are your points. Not that they would in fact tie. And I'm sorry, but anyone that says the PS3 got bad press and the 360 got good press, where were you when the RRoD was on every blog and news site, and all the "doom and gloom 360" threads were going on. The fact that you ignore this again shows your fanboy ignorance. You are either very bad at expressing your points, or happen to have just contradicted yourself so badly to make anyone following this thread question your sanity. I don't think anyone ever mentioned how we decide the console of the year, but the way it is decided in the media, and by Sony's and Microsoft's standard, is sales, unfortunately.
forevercloud3000 said:
@theRepublic refer to my above statement! I believe you are reasonable in your opinion, that you feel that PS3 should not be SOTY for its failures during the end of the year. Yet I urge you to give my above statement a read. If PS3 doesn't deserve SOTY, niether does the 360........
|
Translation: If my precious console, teh PS3zor, does not get the imaginary awardzer, neither does that mean old enemy 360!
| graywolf96 said: I dissagree. Edit: the ps3 will fail, too |
This.
Except for the fail part.
Tag - "No trolling on my watch!"

It's the year of the PS3. God, I don't care about sales, even though this website entirely revolves around sales. Looks at the Wii's lineup for this year. Best sales, shittiest games. I'm a little surprised that the 3rd place "loser" console is getting so much better games than the competition. Argue that all you want, you could say the Wii or 360 had better games this year. But it really didn't, you'll have one hell of a time convincing me that they did. 2008- year of the PS3. And 2009 looks that way, unless MS and Nintendo both suddenly pull 10 amazing looking exlcusives out of their asses and release them before the end of 2009.

@NightSurge
Your Statements are rediculous! What I have been saying is this whole time is that the rules of the game seem to change for the better of the 360 constantly. That 2008 is indeed, not the SOTY but it would be a tie between the two or it would be the Wii. My headline was phrased in the way it is to point out the obvious flaw of the way SOTY or whatever is determined. At first it would seem the criteria was game selection, then this year it turned into sales, when in actuality it should be a mixture of both.
I have not made any fanboy arguments and have stated nothing without some level of reasoning and statements of intelligence. You on the other hand are calling me a "Fanboy" when your main argument for ignoring anything I say is just that. I believe it is in fact you who are the FANBOYZer blah!
EDIT: And you are truly fooling yourself if you think the 360 is put in the same media situation as the PS3. THe RROD issue was not given the amount of spot light it would of had had it been an issue of a Sony console. Your are blind to think the media is even remotely fair to PS3 half of the time. I am pretty sure most reasonable people have seen this and accept it to be bias by now. It is pretty much fact amongst knowledgable gamers that the media hates the PS3 for unfair reasons. Just surf through N4G.com for a few pages and read the amount of DOOM and GLOOM articles for the PS3 in relation to the 20 to every 1 on 360.
It is you who is being fanboyish and refuse to see the truth. Take off the Goggles.


![]()
PSN:Forevercloud (looking for Soul Sacrifice Partners!!!)
In terms of pleasing its userbase: (PS3 vs 360 2008)
Year of the PS3
In terms of sales and strategy with positioning going into 2009:
Year of the Xbox 360.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
In terms of pleasing its userbase 2007: (PS3 vs Xbox 360 )
Year of the Xbox 360.
In terms of position and strategy going into 2008:
Year of the PS3.
Tease.
The PS3 won 2008. Anyone saying otherwise is delusional. Sure, the Wii sold more, but it's a) cheap and b) doesn't sell any software. The 360 didn't even have any games that weren't sequels of some other medicore game.
| S3ph34r0th said: The PS3 won 2008. Anyone saying otherwise is delusional. Sure, the Wii sold more, but it's a) cheap and b) doesn't sell any software. The 360 didn't even have any games that weren't sequels of some other medicore game. |
It actually does sell software otherwise Nintendo would've gone bankrupt making all these games. Also 360 is cheaper than the Wii, but guess what still sold more. Wii. 2006, 07 and 08 were the years of the Wii. If you aren't including Wii because it isn'tHD, than yes, PS3 won 2008.
| S3ph34r0th said: The PS3 won 2008. Anyone saying otherwise is delusional. Sure, the Wii sold more, but it's a) cheap and b) doesn't sell any software. The 360 didn't even have any games that weren't sequels of some other medicore game. |
I'm trying to figure out whether I should report you for trolling or just laugh.
My Mario Kart Wii friend code: 2707-1866-0957