Why wouldn't 2008 be the Year of the PS3 if....

[forevercloud3000]

@NightSurge

Your Statements are rediculous! What I have been saying is this whole time is that the rules of the game seem to change for the better of the 360 constantly. That 2008 is indeed, not the SOTY but it would be a tie between the two or it would be the Wii. My headline was phrased in the way it is to point out the obvious flaw of the way SOTY or whatever is determined. At first it would seem the criteria was game selection, then this year it turned into sales, when in actuality it should be a mixture of both.

I have not made any fanboy arguments and have stated nothing without some level of reasoning and statements of intelligence. You on the other hand are calling me a "Fanboy" when your main argument for ignoring anything I say is just that. I believe it is in fact you who are the FANBOYZer blah!

EDIT: And you are truly fooling yourself if you think the 360 is put in the same media situation as the PS3. THe RROD issue was not given the amount of spot light it would of had had it been an issue of a Sony console. Your are blind to think the media is even remotely fair to PS3 half of the time. I am pretty sure most reasonable people have seen this and accept it to be bias by now. It is pretty much fact amongst knowledgable gamers that the media hates the PS3 for unfair reasons. Just surf through N4G.com for a few pages and read the amount of DOOM and GLOOM articles for the PS3 in relation to the 20 to every 1 on 360.

It is you who is being fanboyish and refuse to see the truth. Take off the Goggles.