By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Sales Discussion - A thread about Sheep, Boys, Men, the PS3 and whether or not you have balls.

MDMAniac said:
Legend11 said:

If Sony doesn't have a price cut in the first half of 2009 I think it's over for Sony.

 

Funny thing is that if they do price-cut, it's over for Sony (hint: bankrupcy)

Not necessarily bankruptcy... They could afford a price cut if they sold off some assets (perhaps someone wants to buy themselves some Sony franchises or studios). Spending billions without an equal amount of savings is not much of an option in the current climate though. Sony already has enough debt (more debt than cash), and getting people to loan you money is not exactly easy during a recession. Who wants to lend money to a company which already has so much debt and no apparent cash cows to generate profits during a recession? Would you lend them your money?

Sony could also decide that market share in the gaming division is more important than other things and sacrifice something somewhere. I wouldn't count on this though. That's why I'm predicting a price cut around November 2009.

 



My Mario Kart Wii friend code: 2707-1866-0957

Around the Network
Tyrannical said:
Gran Turismo's days as a mega franchise are long over.
It used to be the only racing sim out there, now it's not even the best.
Forza's a more accurate simulator, and it's on a cheaper console.

 

 wow! i know people have thier opinions but wow! this is full of fail.

Damage is all it has over GT and thats being fixed soon. sorry GT is FAR ahead of forza... (i own and love forza but its not GT sorry)



Sullla said:
Squilliam said:

You can't use previous generations to really predict whats going to happen in the current generation. The generations have all been different with different circumstances, and this generation isn't playing out like any previous one. Just like the Germans could still surprise the allies with the battle of the Bulge I would say people are under-estimating the response Sony can make, just as people thought Microsoft was completely out of the game 6 months ago.  

Squilliam, I enjoy reading your threads, and I have a lot of respect for you as a poster. With that said, this is one of the dumbest things I've ever seen you write.

This is the standard analyst cop-out explanation. "Oh no! This generation is so different from all the others! No one could have predicted what would happen! It's not our fault that were we horribly inaccurate!" It's pure bull. Yes, there are always some differences in each generation, but the larger trends remain the same. Here are a few of them:

- Within one year of all platforms appearing, a clear market leader emerges and establishes dominance.
- The console with the largest library of highly desired exclusive games always comes out on top, because software sales are what drives hardware sales. I devoted a whole thread to showing this, the fact that Wii is succeeding because of tremendous first-party software sales. It's not about technology - it's about games.
- Market leading platforms eventually see a movement of third-party developers towards them. Secondary platforms slowly see an eroding of developer support. This has never not happened, and it is slowly ongoing right now.
- Lifetime platform sales always work on a bell curve, starting out low and then peaking somewhere around year 3 (give or take one year) before slowing down again. There has never been a succesful console or handheld that had sales declining year over year entering the third year.

I could keep going, but I think the point is obvious. Any time someone throws up their hands and says "this generation is different from all the others!", they aren't paying attention. (Or, more likely, they're trying to offer a fanboy explanation for why their console of choice isn't succeeding.) Nothing really shocking has happened this generation. Once it became clear that the Wii was a huge hit, it was obvious that it would become the market leader in all three regions. I was convinced of this as early as April 2007: when it became clear that the PS3's European launch was not going to propel it past the Wii. Did anyone who wasn't a fanboy expect GTA to kill the Wii? That certainly wasn't surprising. The relative decline of PS3 sales this holiday is the single most surprising thing to happen in the last 12 months, IMO.

If you're going to throw out past trends to try and predict the future, what's the point of this website at all? You might as well do what the ancient Greeks did, and look at sheep entrails for predictions.

 

 This generation is completely different from other generations. The circumstances have changed:

  • Japan is irrelevent for the first time ever. It used to command a significant portion of the market.
  • Never before has a significant proportion of the best talent from third parties not been focused on the winning platform.
  • There has never been a generation where the leading console was significantly underpowered in comparison.
  • There has never been such a stark demographic stratification between consoles.
  • Has there ever been a precedent where the platform in 2nd place has increased for 4 holiday seasons in a row?
  • There has never been a situation where two of the 3 strong platforms are considered equal for the purposes of third party development and considered together against the leading platform.

I think thats enough. There are of course some precedents which can be used to predict future generations, however past precedent in the console market is not the best course for soley predicting the future. For example many people were citing past precedent as the reason why they believed that the Xbox 360 would decline this holiday season. However there are some useful precedents that we can use. For example, its pretty much assured that a console generation isn't won or lost until the past market leader launches or an early mover gains significant traction.



Tease.

noname2200 said:
What is it with New Zealanders and their sheep?

And yeah, I've noticed this too. It's fun to see public opinion sway too and fro, depending on which month it is.

Well, you know, by common Austrian knowledge, sheep can turn boys into men over there.

 



Any message from Faxanadu is written in good faith but shall neither be binding nor construed as constituting a commitment by Faxanadu except where provided for in a written agreement signed by an authorized representative of Faxanadu. This message is intended for the use of the forum members only.

The views expressed here may be personal and/or offensive and are not necessarily the views of Faxanadu.

@Squilliam:

Japan is irrelevent for the first time ever. It used to command a significant portion of the market.

... If you don't include Nintendo. Seriously, Nintendo is from Japan! Their growth pretty much balances out the others' loss.

Has there ever been a precedent where the platform in 2nd place has increased for 4 holiday seasons in a row?

Actually, I'm almost positive the Genesis has. It was released in 89, and I'm pretty sure it peaked in 93 (a year longer than the 360 has been out). The 360 has a ways to go!



Around the Network
Sullla said:
Squilliam said:

You can't use previous generations to really predict whats going to happen in the current generation. The generations have all been different with different circumstances, and this generation isn't playing out like any previous one. Just like the Germans could still surprise the allies with the battle of the Bulge I would say people are under-estimating the response Sony can make, just as people thought Microsoft was completely out of the game 6 months ago.  

Squilliam, I enjoy reading your threads, and I have a lot of respect for you as a poster. With that said, this is one of the dumbest things I've ever seen you write.

This is the standard analyst cop-out explanation. "Oh no! This generation is so different from all the others! No one could have predicted what would happen! It's not our fault that were we horribly inaccurate!" It's pure bull. Yes, there are always some differences in each generation, but the larger trends remain the same. Here are a few of them:

- Within one year of all platforms appearing, a clear market leader emerges and establishes dominance.
- The console with the largest library of highly desired exclusive games always comes out on top, because software sales are what drives hardware sales. I devoted a whole thread to showing this, the fact that Wii is succeeding because of tremendous first-party software sales. It's not about technology - it's about games.
- Market leading platforms eventually see a movement of third-party developers towards them. Secondary platforms slowly see an eroding of developer support. This has never not happened, and it is slowly ongoing right now.
- Lifetime platform sales always work on a bell curve, starting out low and then peaking somewhere around year 3 (give or take one year) before slowing down again. There has never been a succesful console or handheld that had sales declining year over year entering the third year.

I could keep going, but I think the point is obvious. Any time someone throws up their hands and says "this generation is different from all the others!", they aren't paying attention. (Or, more likely, they're trying to offer a fanboy explanation for why their console of choice isn't succeeding.) Nothing really shocking has happened this generation. Once it became clear that the Wii was a huge hit, it was obvious that it would become the market leader in all three regions. I was convinced of this as early as April 2007: when it became clear that the PS3's European launch was not going to propel it past the Wii. Did anyone who wasn't a fanboy expect GTA to kill the Wii? That certainly wasn't surprising. The relative decline of PS3 sales this holiday is the single most surprising thing to happen in the last 12 months, IMO.

If you're going to throw out past trends to try and predict the future, what's the point of this website at all? You might as well do what the ancient Greeks did, and look at sheep entrails for predictions.

This post lacks merit.

It was very predictable that PS3 would suffer a relative decline in sales after the 360 prices were cut the way they were.  Vs. the other consoles, certainly.  Year over year PS3 sales decline was less a foregone conclusion but with the economy turning down, it makes complete sense.

Plus, you seem to use points about the Wii's success to imply that PS3 can't improve its relative situation.  Which doesn't follow.

 



My Pick in late 06 - PS3
My Pick in early 07 - PS3
My Pick in Late 07 - PS3
My Pick in Early 08 - PS3
My Pick Right now - PS3

Nice thread btw.



4 ≈ One

I can proudly look at my early year prediction for console sales in 2008!

Probably the best on VGC.