LBP up to 6 from 21,

Does someone actually know how Chart-Track does its value chart ? To me, it looks like they just multiply the numbers in the individual chart by the retail price of the game, regardless of bundles. I'm saying that because I'm really surprised to see the budget priced 'Lego Indiana Jones' and 'Kungfu Panda' in place 37 and 39.

This two games (lego indy and kung fu panda), are given with the 360, so i think their value are 0£. So, it appears only in the top the value of the others sales of these game. It's what i hink, not sure it's right, but logical for me.

It's based on the actual tracked value. For bundles they deduct the average non-bundled hardware price from it.

so, 360 Elite and Pro Sales are up , arcade sales are down. This means that Nintendo is doing a decent job other meeting demand (otherwise you would have people getting the cheaper 360 instead of the Wii...)

Yaaah, LBP number 6! HUGE increase - hope this means a nice hardware increase too.

Okay, I would have personnaly choosen a 0£ value like Lombard, but the deduction from the equivalent non-bundled hardware makes sense too.

So I assume that the 360 + Lego Indy + Kung Fu Panda cost more than the non bundled hardware ?

Is that a typo in the main paragraph for UK: "LittleBigPlanet’ up from No29 to No16" Shouldn't it be 21 to 6?

On second thought, all the listed numbers are whack. =S

It's a comment on the All Format chart, not the individual one.

I don't even know if there is any non-bundled 360 hardware, and if so how much cheaper it is selling. Here's an example for Wii Play: