It's not simply just a matter of having a different opinion. It's a matter of attacking the other person's opinion and using inflamatory language such as "Fanboy". Varying opinions is a given in situations like these so bringing it up as an excuse is moot. Its the nature in which these opinions are exchanged which is the problem, not the fact that they exist or are presented.

Also, Hus (Huss/Washimul/Blue3) is dodging a permaban. That is grounds for a ban of any account that arises afterwards. No one is advocating he be banned now solely for his opinion, but rather his past indiscretions.

Well since my responce means the world to you. Everything in the article i though was good. They way it does not hold back on crappy wii 1st and 3rd party games, how it mention many multiplatform games selling the least on the wii.  A fact that is very denied on here.

A good part

"Publishers need to realize that casual gamers don't play games very often and hardcore gamers don’t give a crap about crappy games. And while the Wii looks like a great opportunity for video game publishers to cash-in on a gullible and naive consumer (i.e., the casual gamer) gamers and video game journalist really need to step up and let their voice be heard against this pathetic and money-hungry tactic."

and my favorite.

Alternatively, Nintendo really needs to step up and be the guiding light for other publishers out there. They need to either regulate the kind of quality that’s being put into these games or at least show that the Wii can have quality made games that match their quality made retail prices. Because after Metroid and Mario are out and about, gamers will be left with Nitro Bike sequels, unplayably bad Ghost Squad shooters and Alien SyndromeNitro Bike sequels, unplayably bad Ghost Squad shooters and Alien Syndrome spin-offs.

ehh sure, but I don't start thread write that an articel is a good read and then disapear or do I? The only thing that got Killzone3 back in the thread was when I asked if it was ok to ask for a ban if someone started a thread and then disapeared. We have a number of posters on this forum that post and then when someone answers with good arguement they just disapear. Killzone3 is one of them acording to me, and if he hisn't intressting in having a good argument WTF is he starting thread for?

After the threat of reporting his behavior, Killzone3 seems to have cleaned up his approach and choice of wording for the debate. Might be a good technique for dealing with him in the future.

Also since almost every major japanese developer has committed themselves to developing for the Wii/DS I think we can anticipate seeing alot more games in the future. It's naive and arguably malicious to suggest that this first year of games is all the Wii is going to have. Or perhaps... is it instead, wishful thinking.

 Its not like he has not been called a fanboy, why is he singled out if he does it ?  Can you prove he is those other names ?  If hes was not banned and had the ability to post his opinion, why now after he ahs posted his opinion are you saying he should be banned for his past indiscretions.  Thats kinda hypocrytical thinking right there.

Well its a forum you post things in

Maybe its just something someone wants to share, not everything has to be boiled down to an argument between the differant factions on here.

Maybe a thread ranking system is needed, if it falls below a certain limit the thread auto closes it self ?

It is well known he is one in the same with those others. Incidentally can any of the mods prove everyone who has been banned for allegedly being Gballzack was in fact Gballzack? No. It's a matter of relying on common knowledge and common sense.

Hypocrisy would require contradictory logic, which there is no of here. I think you're using the word incorrectly. I was not aware Hus had returned until I came upon this debate, that is why I made an issue of it when I did. I'm sorry to inform you that I'm not lurking from the shadows aloof awaiting those dodging permabans to rear their heads. You're suggestion that I chose to bring this up in light of his comments is really unfounded as I have in no way expressed direct dissagreement or dissaproval of his argument or opinion. I said using the word fanboy in general is a poor manuver, that would apply to anyone who uses the word, not Hus alone. Thus there was no singling him out. You're drawing too many conclusions from where there is none to be had. Stick to the facts, it makes the whole debating process alot smoother.

We all know its Gballzack from the avs used, anime/hentai crap of that sort.

As far as hus, you want him banned for his past indiscretions yet he was not baned for them or he was brought back even with his his past indiscretions.  So why should he be banned for them now ? 

If you aren't ready to arguement about whay you post you shouldn't post things on a forum that clearly people would disagree with it is as simply as that. When 5 guys jumps on and says that this articel more or less is shit and you have wroten that it is a good read then mayby you should point out why you agree with the articel? I mean this is like I would post an articel that states that PS3 wont get any good 3rd party games (which it clearly will get) write that it is a good read and than disapear. The articel should also be so badly written that the arguement is changing during the length of the articel.