Editorial: Nintendo’s Wii Is The Gaming Industry’s Financial Scapegoat

[Sporticus]

AllAll said:

Sporticus said:

AllAll said:
Having a different opinion is not flaming, someone thinks a game is crap that their opinion. You cant change their mind thats what they think. Just because their opinion does not fit yours does not mean its flaming.

People will always have different opinions, well not in communism or fascism. Is that what you want this forum to be ? Wii is the greatest, wii games are great wii owners are right everyone else and their opinon is wrong they don't fit in with out views lets ban them. Or like robjoh did just threaten them with a ban, and if they fire back well then you successfully baited them they fell for it attacked back and now you can justify you ban. Hey it worked.

It's not simply just a matter of having a different opinion. It's a matter of attacking the other person's opinion and using inflamatory language such as "Fanboy". Varying opinions is a given in situations like these so bringing it up as an excuse is moot. Its the nature in which these opinions are exchanged which is the problem, not the fact that they exist or are presented.

Also, Hus (Huss/Washimul/Blue3) is dodging a permaban. That is grounds for a ban of any account that arises afterwards. No one is advocating he be banned now solely for his opinion, but rather his past indiscretions.

 Its not like he has not been called a fanboy, why is he singled out if he does it ?  Can you prove he is those other names ?  If hes was not banned and had the ability to post his opinion, why now after he ahs posted his opinion are you saying he should be banned for his past indiscretions.  Thats kinda hypocrytical thinking right there.

It is well known he is one in the same with those others. Incidentally can any of the mods prove everyone who has been banned for allegedly being Gballzack was in fact Gballzack? No. It's a matter of relying on common knowledge and common sense.

Hypocrisy would require contradictory logic, which there is none of in my comments I think you're using the word incorrectly. I was not aware Hus had returned until I came upon this debate, that is why I made an issue of it when I did. I'm sorry to inform you that I'm not lurking from the shadows aloof awaiting those dodging permabans to rear their heads. You're suggestion that I chose to bring this up in light of his comments is really unfounded as I have in no way expressed direct dissagreement or dissaproval of his argument or opinion. I said attacking other's opinions and using the word fanboy in general is a poor debating, that would apply to anyone who does so, not Hus alone. Thus there was no singling him out. You're drawing too many conclusions from where there is none to be had. Stick to the facts, it makes the whole debating process alot smoother.