By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
AllAll said:
robjoh said:
AllAll said:
robjoh are you not the one that should be reported for flamebait by threating others with possible bans ? You are the one that started the little exchange, you are as guilty as anyone else.


ehh sure, but I don't start thread write that an articel is a good read and then disapear or do I? The only thing that got Killzone3 back in the thread was when I asked if it was ok to ask for a ban if someone started a thread and then disapeared. We have a number of posters on this forum that post and then when someone answers with good arguement they just disapear. Killzone3 is one of them acording to me, and if he hisn't intressting in having a good argument WTF is he starting thread for?


Well its a forum you post things in

Maybe its just something someone wants to share, not everything has to be boiled down to an argument between the differant factions on here.

Maybe a thread ranking system is needed, if it falls below a certain limit the thread auto closes it self ?


If you aren't ready to arguement about whay you post you shouldn't post things on a forum that clearly people would disagree with it is as simply as that. When 5 guys jumps on and says that this articel more or less is shit and you have wroten that it is a good read then mayby you should point out why you agree with the articel? I mean this is like I would post an articel that states that PS3 wont get any good 3rd party games (which it clearly will get) write that it is a good read and than disapear. The articel should also be so badly written that the arguement is changing during the length of the articel.



 

 

Buy it and pray to the gods of Sigs: Naznatips!