"@BTFeather55:
Wow, just wow. I've never seen anyone litterally get an orgasm over IGN.
You must be totally blind due to some strange loyalty or not been following them for a while because they have made significant mistakes lately:"
Or, I've been following them long enough to know where they are coming from and that they've been consistent in giving the games that deserved them the good scores that they have deserved over the years.
"-Shaun White: "oh, the HD version is so much better" later: Wii gets higher score"
I guess the boogie board gave it an advantage.
-"Square Enix must learn to use Unreal 3 cause Infinte Undiscovery sucks" while IU isn't made with UE3."
Well, apparently whatever engine it was running, it apparently was not doing a good job at it.
"-They gave a 2 for Sega Soccer Manger. Reason: You don't play soccer *facepalm*"
Yeah, well in the era of EA's NCAA games, I'd be inclined to give Jeff Sagarin's Hoops a 2.0 too because you don't play basketball in it.
-A 10 for GTAIV. Granted they weren't the only one, but while a good game, everyone that wasn't caught up in the hype wouldn't have given it a 10.
-EXACTLY the same score for Resistance and Gears? Sure."
I guess these last two are the crux of the matter. I'm sory that GTA IV was better than any other game that came out this gen prior to its release and it remained so until MGS4 was released. And yeah, taking into account what Epic was promising with Gears 2: a better story than MGS which turned out to be a pipe dream, a game two times as big as the first one which was going to be the true 10 of this gen, I'm glad that IGN gave the game its proper do. It wasn't much of an improvement over the first in any fashion and certainly not up to MGS and GTA 4 quality. On the other hand, the PS3 staff must have thought Resistance 2 was a better effort from Insomniac than last year's R & C Future which they gave a 9.4 last year, and they decided to give award it accordingly. From all the great things I've heard about Little Big Planet, I would be more concerned about Gears 2 getting as a high a score as that one at IGN and much better sales when Game Rankings bears out the fact that LBP is actually better.
"And we can continue. IGN is really losing it lately."
Doesn't really seem like it to me.
"Furthermore you're clearly trolling, as you can give tons of bad things about a very promising Wii RPG line-up with stupid remarks like: "I want my new gen games to be new gen"."
No, it's called defending my positions there is a difference.
"Posting numerous review scores (strangely from different sources) for FF doesn't change anything about the fact that it isn't the ONLY great thing coming for JRPG fans."
As usual in almost all gens, FFXIII PS3 will be the first great and genre defining rpg of this gen.
"It definitely been a consistently high quality series, but XII wasn't that good and SE hasn't been on a roll lately."
I thought I already pointed out that Dave Halverson's Play magazine gave FFXII a 10 and IGN gave it a 9.5. Play also listed it in the top 5 in their Top 25 jrpgs of all time a couple of years ago and Nick Des Barres and the boys have been the masters of determining JRPG quality in this country since the days of Diehard Gamefan. Plus, Famitsu gave FFXII one of their ultra rare perfect scores.
"Not to say FF13 won't be good, cause I'm definitely looking forward to it. But if you prefer a short trailer of a game over 7 upcoming Wii JRPGs you're not really an RPG fan."
Square's track record for bringing the quality over about twenty years of time is what means more to mean than 7 rpgs from mainly yet to be proven developers not some short trailer albeit the heroine in it is cute.
You know Square and Final Fantasy are the video game and jrpg equivalent of Ric Flair. Ric Flair climbed that mountain 16 times over a 30 year period, man, and as he always said, "Diamonds are forever, and so is Final Fantasy."