GT may prefer 360 over PS3, but the site itself is like a Heaven for PS3 fanboys. All they do there is proclaim PS3 as the best thing ever in existance and *insert PS3 exclusive here* as the best game of this generation. Someone creates a thread proclaiming something like this, and others enter it to say how much they agree. I used to be one of them ^_^ But it has become boring.

Wait. He wrote THAT to say that Gametrailers is not biased?
What a moron.

I must say, the

"However, this goes without noting that I was focusing on major blockbuster titles like the Halos and the Gears and the Call of Duty's; titles that move consoles and market share. Sony not only needs to update its controller, but it also needs to incorporate it with an enjoyable, story-driven exclusive franchise to rival the mind-blowing Microsoft heavyweights Gears of War and Halo franchises. Do this, and you shall live. Do it not, and every one of you will die today."

Was my favourite part. Apparently, MGS4 doesn't exist. It's more story driven than Halo and Gears of War put together. It has 7 hours of cutscenes!

Well, I think the 360 controller is the controller who sucks. I was an owner of the 360 and I sold it. The controller was simply the reason. It was too big for me , and it felt like it had plastic surgery (I havent got fatty hands so the ps3 controller fits correctly in my hands). I've been using the PS controllers for many many years so I'm used to it. Okay.. It might not be the best controller for FPS-games but it is especially made for sports, race, rpg, stealth, TPS. hack and slash and fightgames. I wonder why you 360-fanboys blaming the ps3 controller (having fatty hands does not mean that the ps3 controller is bad)

I am a little confused about the story driven Halo 3. Was not on the version i bought. Anybody claiming HALO 3 to be story driven or classic is a fanboy. I have never been so disappointed in a title than this after the hype. Only a misguided (or paid) fool could think otherwise. I also have Gears 2 and even though it has a story it is hardly full of emotion. Gears 2 also is no different to the first and any attempts to show innovation are poorly implemented.(i mean the whole using a worm as a wall is a complete waste and tacked on extra). I have the luxury of playing both consoles regularly and find the PS controller better, why? cus it fits properly. I always find the 360 one a little large and lets not talk about the lack of built in battery, just another accessory you need to buy, which in the end all adds up. I tend to steer clear of GT mainly because of that Pratcher bloke, i mean you can smell his crap before he starts talking.

Thumbstick Controllers best for Fast FPS games - Wrong. 

Mouse is way faster - the UT3 port to the PS3 they had to slow it down by 20% because otherwise the people using their sixaxis were betting hammered by the people using mouse and keyboard.

Mouse is faster, easier , more accurate more intuitive and far more enjoyable to use for FPS than any thumbstick controller ever made. Thumbsticks were designed for 2D platform games and I was hoping should have been dropped from this generation of games consoles completly -

GT are correct the PS3-sixaxis is outdated -the Wii mote is the new way to play.

They can't possibly be biased based on those obviously biased Assassin's Creed and GRID videos... right? Right?!?

(Was it GRID that they showed PS3 as the XBox version and said it looked worse?)

hmm, to condense that down its "GT is not biased towards 360 we just think its the better console regardless" dear, oh dear.

How about a SPOILERS tag when giving out the entire story of a game!

yea right, thanks Stats87. Just ruin it for everyone!

You got links to prove that?

And with mouse you have to pick it up and move it back over thats at least 2 seconds lost while joysticks you can just hold it and you keep going over